Re: Flu jabs
Originally Posted by
tarantula
->
My husband and I had our yearly flu jabs this morning, it seems a worthwhile thing to do.
This is an old topic Tarantula. If you search you will find other threads discussing the flu jab.
I'm curious as to why you think it is a "worthwhile thing to do"
The facts, peer reviewed facts, involving over 2000 studies covering over 8 million people tested, reveal that the flu jab is one the biggest marketing scams in modern history.
Unless you did your research beforehand you wouldn't have known this. If you trusted your GP then time to rethink imo. The medical industry is simply a big business now and GP's must follow the party line and that line in this instance is to push flu jabs aggressively.
What you need to know:
1) The Cochrane Library is the Interntionally respected benchmark organisation for reviewing all things medical. They have reviewed studies for all manner of things. They have reviewed the flu jab.
2) The results of the 2000+ studies which involved over 8 million people concluded that the flu jab is only likely to benefit approx 1 person in every 100.
That is, for every flu jab given, 99 people will get no benefit at all, and only 1 will.
Here is the link to the report:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1....pub5/abstract
3) Flu jabs contain a mercury based compound called Thimerosal. The concentration of this compound is particularly high. Mercury is one of THE most toxic substances to the human body. Thimerosal is 50% mercury.
The levels of Thimerosal in a flu jab are allegedly very small and many claim that it can do no harm. My take on this is that if only 1 in 100 people benefit from the flu jab, why take the risk at all?
Here are some detail of mercury levels found in life:
Mercury levels
ppb = parts per billion
2ppb = Maximum mercury contaminant level in drinking water set by the EPA
250 ppb = Typical mercury level in Tuna
51,000 ppb = Mercury level found in Flu shots
4) Because Big Pharma effectively control the politicians and food and drug administrations they have seen to it that the law does NOT require vaccines to be properly tested.
Here is a photo of an actual Flu Jab packet which openly admits there has been no testing and that there is no proof that it helps with influenza:
Here is a picture of the insert sheet inside the packet which highlights that :
a) The SAFETY and effectiveness of the flu jab have not been established
b) The levels of Mercury in it
c) It has not been tested for carcinogenic and mutagenic potential or for impairment of fertility
CONCLUSIONS
I will pull no punches here so please forgive me if this offends.
1) If you took a flu jab and didn't bother to research what it was - imo you are very unwise
2) If you took a flu jab and didn't ask to see the packet and didn't read the ingredients and information - imo you are very unwise
3) If you took a flu jab on the basis that you might just be that 1 person in 100 that benefits whilst taking on the risk of having Thimerosal in your system - imo you are unwise
Flu jabs are a total scam. The scientific peer reviewed data exists to prove that, but the medical industry continues to pump out jabs in order to make $millions. They control everything from the top down. The medical staff and the whole of the NHS is a part of that machine and they have to tow the line with this.
In the end you must do what is right for you but it is vitally important to be completely informed.
ATB