Re: Over and Out
Originally Posted by
Solasch
->
Perhaps you are ignorant of the speaking rules in europarliament. Farage was attributed 4 minutes time to address parliament. The chair of the parliament keeps oversight that every member sticks to that time and doesn't ussurp the time of others (seems a tactic common in HoC?).
If a speaking member exceeds his alloted time, or uses abusive language, his/her microphone is closed. It seems a more sophisticated way than shouting: order! Order!
I apologize for the length of the following, but I have been thinking about this event for most of the afternoon.
Solasch, I agree with you that this forum is an excellent way to exchange ideas, and I appreciate your views. I fully believe that civility is at the heart of diplomacy, conflict resolution, and more importantly - respect and consideration for others.
No doubt, there is a fine line between free speech and chaos.
I certainly agree that there are times when cutting the microphone might be appropriate per the rules of protocol, but McGuiness's choice to cut off Farage was neither because of time nor because of abusive language. We don't know for sure because the rule that was broken was not articulated. Nothing in his is comments were incendiary enough to incite a melee and so his free speech rights were unjustifiably violated.
However, you piqued my interest, Solasch, so I read up on the flag-waving and found that it is technically a violation of protocol to wave a flag the plenary chamber. The consequence is not nearly as benign as cutting off the microphone (and violating free speech). In fact, it is more severe. MEP's who violate the rule are not allowed to travel on their junkets for a period of one year.
A year? That's some oppressive penalty for stating one's mind in the form of expressing the flag of a member state in a meeting. That's a problem.
Is assertively waving the EU flag a violation during a session? Interestingly, it is not. Why? Because the EU doesn't consider itself to be equal to each member state, it considers itself to be
above member nations. Nations are expected to yield their national identity to the authority of the EU. That's also a problem.
Should anyone wonder, suppression of the waving of a flag is an absolute violation of free speech. The EU made this clear by regularly trying to make it a crime to burn an EU flag (which is odd considering the EU is not a nation). Yet another problem. Again, because in weighing rights and chaos, one would hope that the MEP's would have more fortitude than to allow themselves to be offended by a symbol to the point of chaos-inducing behavior. Kudos to the MEPs of various nations who exemplified decorum that during when Farage started waving.
If there is outrage and/or consequences to be had over Farage's flag-waving as an embarrassment - then the consequences should ONLY come from the democracy that put him in that position. It is up to the voters to determine whether or not he can speak in such a manner and get away with it. It is absolutely none of EU's business whether or not Farage's remarks were rude or inappropriate. The EU exercising authoritarianism over democracy might just be the biggest problem of all.
All said, the news is good here for everyone. What we all should be celebrating is that the appropriate scrutiny is
exactly what taking place in this discussion forum (and countless other places). There is a healthy debate about whether or not Farage's behavior was acceptable, and the voting public will ultimately send their message, one way or the other, to Farage and other politicians. Even better, we are able to share and watch the speech! (Thank you, Puddle Duck.) Solasch, neither your opinion nor mine should be given much weight unless the forum members and voters out there are willing to consider it, but at the very least, I am grateful to be able to be given a chair in the audience.