Re: A glimmer of sense
SF since you have narrowed down your reasons for leaving the EU to not wanting to be "ruled " by Europe (an emotive term I don't like because it smacks of divine right) can you tell me in what areas you are "ruled"?
If sovereignty rests in the ability to make your own decisions, I suppose you are familiar with the facts that the UK is sovereign in
decisions about budget allocation
taxation
interest rates
health provision
education
social service provision
issuance of gilts
levels of borrowing
civil laws involving sexuality, marriage and civil contracts, wills and charity law
Border control since you are not in Schengen
Financial support and use of the police...priorities etc
Economic decisions about austerity, support for certain sectors of the economy, tax rates including corporation tax, benefit sums and who gets them
deportations
the civil legal code
the interpretation of the constitution and how Parliament is run even to the undemocratic House of Lords
the position of the press in public life (should Murdoch be allowed to take over Sky for example)
land management in terms of building homes, brownbelt and greenbelt
investing in international projects
laws about consumer protection
I could go on but that's off the top of my head.
The only laws that are issued by the EU which are required to be followed have to do in some way with either synchronisation of trade or the environment...ie CAP or labelling or transport or growing methods or the precursor to the Paris Agreement...the EU environmental controls...water, soil, naturalising, animal protection etc etc.
Because that is what the EU is there for...and in doing what it does it now has an economy larger than that of the USA, far more liberal and a damned sight more sensible.
This thing of "hands off and don't tell me what to do" is also press generated. Do you think that other countries would not balk if the EU interfered too much in their affairs (which is the same across the EU)? You have some very proud countries in the EU which would soon shout if their sovereignty were touched. and never think they are too stupid to notice.
You may have read about the events in Poland ATM. If you did you lay have realised that if their new laws regarding the judiciary pass the country will have lost a lot of its judicial objectivity. The EU is objecting...because it goes against the principles of the EU. Is it not a good thing for the people of Poland to be checked in this issue? There have been issues like this in Hungary when the country nearly lost its constitution.
I know the UK would not be like this but the EU has prevented loss of democracy in at least two countries. Is this not a GOOD thing?
The ECJ only deals with cases that concern EU maw. It has not overridden UK law. The human rights court in Europe is the ECHR which is NOT part of the ECJ OR the EU. It is they who deal with immigration and deportation issues. NOT the EU.
So in all that is holy, what laws are so onerous that you cannot respect laws that do you and everyone else good??? Stamping feet and saying "we want to make all our own laws" is the mark of a ten year old!
and BTW the UK has as much power to input the EU decision making process as any other country. Influence in the EU corridors are where decisions at taken, not in the voting process. When Cameron took the UK MEP's out of the biggest EU party and planted them into one of the smallest, he took away a lot of th at power to influence. Farage finished the job by being the biggest, most insulting joke in the EU.
So perhaps you would like to let us know what laws you are chafing under..enough to trash your country?