Re: Labour Getting Even Worse on Immigration
Originally Posted by
Devo
->
I would think home grown terrorists come from parents who may or may not be immigrants themselves and who are probably not terrorists. Not really a defence of a hostile immigration environment, is it?
The Mail was Nazi supporting in the Thirties and hasn't really changed its political stance. It spouts inflammatory lies on a daily basis and is read by the gullible, the idiotic and fellow travellers. Paul Dacre, its editor, is certifiable and it is owned by a Non-Dom tax avoider yet it wields a lot of influence in the Tory party. Scary is hardly the word!
The terrorists come from Muslim communities, who originate from Muslim countries. Yeah? As Douglas Murray pointed out, "the more Islam you have the more terrorism you will get".
The looney Left never tire of banging on about the 1930s but they never ever mention that The Daily Mirror took exactly the same stance. Left-wingers like their hero George Bernard Shaw was a great admirer of Mussolini but they never ever mention that either. Or the number of Left-wingers who loved Stalin.
Lord Rothermere's support for Mosley evaporated when he saw the violence and antisemitism associated with his group. And he at least foresaw the potential threat from Germany, and campaigned for rearmament, whilst papers on the left – such as the Guardian – were critical of Hitler but opposed rearming.
People read The Mail because it has been right about so many issues over the decades including the immigration shambles. And speaks for the majority of respectable, law abiding people in England. And of course it has the best journalists.
The Mail's 4.3 million daily readers include more from the top three social classes (A, B and C1) than the Times, Guardian, Independent (before it closed as a hard copy paper) and Financial Times combined.