20-02-2018, 03:59 PM
31
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by Twink55
->
So do I Mups! that was exactly my point. Humans, believing that are the superior species, will probably destroy all life on this planet.......because they always want more!
20-02-2018, 04:02 PM
32
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by Twink55
->
So do I Mups! that was exactly my point. Humans, believing that are the superior species, will probably destroy all life on this planet.......because they always want more!
I agree again!
But as I said earlier, the government is always complaining about what us poor old buggers cost to keep alive, it seems they only want young healthy people they don't have to pay out much for. Yet there are the scientists, and wealthy drug companies making their living out of preserving us even longer - unless of course, the choice would only be offered to young, otherwise fit people?
I wonder if these animals will even survive with humans organs growing inside them, instead of having the correct organs for their species?
I wonder about things like ....... even if horse could grow and survive with a human heart beating instead it, or a human liver, how would a human organ cope with a horse's lifestyle and diet?
Could a liver for example, thrive on a grass diet, or fed horse-feed from a bag? Could a human heart survive a horse galloping at speed?
There again, I don't suppose the horse would ever be allowed to have an outside life with other horses for company, which would mean he'd never be able to run or graze in a sunny field.
20-02-2018, 04:08 PM
33
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by tarantula
->
Of course we are the superior species, other animals are there for human use.
We already know your 'compassionate' views on animals thank you Tara, you have made it plain many times before, so I do not see the need to keep reiterating it.
Other, more intelligent souls understand they are not born souly to suffer a life of cruelty and abuse without having any choice.
And before you carry on, I do not intend to get into an argument with you.
You think your way - I think mine. Nothing to argue about, so I would rather leave it at that.
20-02-2018, 04:51 PM
34
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by Mups
->
We already know your 'compassionate' views on animals thank you Tara, you have made it plain many times before, so I do not see the need to keep reiterating it.Other, more intelligent souls understand they are not born souly to suffer a life of cruelty and abuse without having any choice.
And before you carry on, I do not intend to get into an argument with you.
You think your way - I think mine. Nothing to argue about, so I would rather leave it at that.
Every life has a purpose, but that purpose is not to serve humans
20-02-2018, 04:52 PM
35
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by Mups
->
We already know your 'compassionate' views on animals thank you Tara, you have made it plain many times before, so I do not see the need to keep reiterating it.Other, more intelligent souls understand they are not born souly to suffer a life of cruelty and abuse without having any choice.
And before you carry on, I do not intend to get into an argument with you.
You think your way - I think mine. Nothing to argue about, so I would rather leave it at that.
20-02-2018, 05:11 PM
36
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by Twink55
->
Well said Mups! We all have differing opinions on many subjects....but when people have to keep repeating, it sounds more like an attempt to pressure people to think their way.Every life has a purpose, but that purpose is not to serve humans
Steady on Twink. We'll have the 'anti-clique' brigade after us if you keep agreeing with me.
20-02-2018, 11:16 PM
37
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by Twink55
->
Well said Mups! We all have differing opinions on many subjects....but when people have to keep repeating, it sounds more like an attempt to pressure people to think their way.Every life has a purpose, but that purpose is not to serve humans
Originally Posted by tarantula
->
People should not be cruel to animals just for fun, and I have reported people who have been doing so in the past. However, humans must always come first and whilst animals should be killed as humanely as possible for our use, I have no problem with eating their flesh, using leather goods, and woollen garments. If you eat animals I don't see why people object to using them for medical purposes.
21-02-2018, 09:34 AM
40
Re: Mad Scientists at it again
Originally Posted by tarantula
->
Because we are the top dogs, other species are subservient to us, and as long as they are killed with as little pain as possible, I have no problem at all with their use. If others don't wish to use animal products that is up to them.
|
|
