Re: Missile Strikes launched against Syria tonight
Originally Posted by
Twink55
->
Well we each have different thoughts Morty. I am no fan of USA politics and agree that they are always too ready to go to war, but I don't want chemical warfare to be used, and with the harsh attitudes of Russia and the Milddle East , on the value of life... they will have no problem using it!
You didn't see my post about Agent Orange did you
The US, Russia .. they both wear the opposing sides of the same face.
War, and protecting their own interests in the ME.
It suits Russia to back Assad.
It suits the US to back the rebels to destabilise Syria, and by dint of association Iran. Both countries Shiite.
Incidentally, this morning the Syrian rebels expressed disappointment as they'd really wanted Assad's conventional weaponry curbed .... they don't give a stuff about the distinction of a moral lesson over alleged chemicals usage.
They've related this 'moral lesson' in terms of any tactical advantage it might have given them in the larger issue of the Civil War. They're disappointed.
Question: Would you prefer a more stable post-war Syria with Assad as victor , at least nominally in charge until politicians and diplomacy can help negotiate a lasting peace there?
Or ... Assad taken out. Regime change. A massive country left up for grabs and ripe for infiltration by various warring rebel factions allowing another breeding ground for extremists like Isis? Remember Libya and Iraq as sobering lessons of 'what not to do'.
Which offers a better future for Syria?
And just how much Western manipulation should be allowed so we can craft a ME that suits us?