Re: Future Humans.
Personally I think that, assuming we survive that long, mankind will 'evolve' in a completely different way. I think that 100,000 years is too short a period for even that minor difference to evolve, after all modern man (Homo sapiens) has been around essentially unchanged for nearly 200,000 years. Natural evolution is driven by need, and I don't think the need for larger eyes is necessary, given that modern man spends most of his life in lighted conditions natural or otherwise. I suspect that man's natural evolution has essentially been brought to a halt as we have come to control our environment more and more. Yes, man has, on average, grown taller and lives longer than a few hundred years ago but this is due to advances in nutrition and medicine rather than evolution.Re: Future Humans.
"I think future man will be changed not by evolution but by artificial modification. Already we see the rudimentary beginnings of man/machine integration in the case of the quadriplegic who had a chip implanted in his brain which has given him some control over his previously unusable limbs"Re: Future Humans.
I think we'll change considerably in just 1,000 years - once we master genetics, we'll be able to remodel ourselves how we want; better eyesight, 100 times the memory, bigger muscles, self repairing - only our imagination will be the limit.
|