Re: Climate Change
Don't you just love it when pundits claim to know how things were 22,000 years ago?!!! lol
Yeah. Boston was covered in a glacier, I have my great, great, great, great, great, grandmother's old photos of it . . . .
The Earth together with the entire solar system here, is whizzing through space at 828,000 km/h or 514,000 mph.
That's 142 miles EVERY SECOND !
The solar system is travelling around the galactic central point of our galaxy, the Milky Way. Estimates of the length of one orbit range from 225 to 250 million terrestrial years.
So frankly, no-one currently living on planet Earth has one tiny iota of a clue what happens to the planet along it's merry orbit of the galaxy. Not one iota of a clue.
All climate change theory, essentially hinges off the data and numbers put forward by various groups of people. They all have an agenda. How then, can you trust the figures?
The graph is pretty, presented in a comical way, a way that appeals to people who don't "think" which is a large percentage of the currently and purposefully dumbed down populous.
It's not a way to conduct a debate on a serious issue. It should be highlighting its source data factually, impartially, unequivocally.
There should be all manner of metrics from meteorological groups, peer reviewed data. And just as with the Cochrane Library and the medical industry, there should be protocols in place to prevent any individual groups from sponsoring data reports and analytical studies so that they can effectively sway the results.
There is no impartial data here. In fact no data at all, just a pretty graph that says "look, this is how it is because, . . . well . . . that's how we say it is . . . . don't worry your pretty little heads over the finer details ok?"
Like everything in this shitty little world now, ruled as it is by corrupt crooks, criminals and greedy power-mad money grabbers, you have to do your research, dig deep, dig long and hard in order to get to the true data.
I haven't done that on this specific issue of Climate Change yet but I've done it for other things. The point is however, that the graph presented doesn't constitute that kind of impartial research. So it is worthless. Merely propaganda.
So you have to ask:
1. Why are they going to the trouble of publishing such material?
and
2. Why don't they want me to actually THINK properly about the subject using real data from real internationally respected bodies?