03-11-2017, 03:34 PM
101
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
Originally Posted by realspeed
->
No way do I have communist leanings and in truth I resent the implication. I would be gratiful if any such suggestion be removed from this thread please
I don't think anyone has suggested you have communist leanings ...
03-11-2017, 03:36 PM
102
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
Originally Posted by Meg
->
Bazza it seems if you have communist leanings,
Originally Posted by Meg
->
every little minor sleaze related allegation has to be reported on if it concerns one political party but if concerns another party like labour even allegations of rape are not worthy of comment. See my earlier post....
http://www.over50sforum.com/showthre...07#post1265207
It's the old story of 'Equality for all except for those a communist considers not to be equal'
Meg you did and that really upset me
03-11-2017, 03:39 PM
103
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
Originally Posted by realspeed
->
linkWy hasn't Uncle Joe reported this. Scumbag labour party at it again
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41853430
Originally Posted by Meg
->
Bazza it seems if you have communist leanings, every little minor sleaze related allegation has to be reported on if it concerns one political party but if concerns another party like labour even allegations of rape are not worthy of comment. See my earlier post....
http://www.over50sforum.com/showthre...07#post1265207
It's the old story of 'Equality for all except for those a communist considers not to be equal'
you have misread the post I think, no one has suggested you have communist leanings, you asked why UJ didn't report on a particular case and I told you why I thought that was having questioned the same thing myself earlier in the thread.
03-11-2017, 04:37 PM
104
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
Originally Posted by realspeed
->
how can i misread thisOriginally Posted by Meg View Post
Bazza it seems if you have communist leanings, you really upset me saying that.
It should be read as
`Bazza, it seems if you have communists leanings, (alluding to UJ) then every little minor sleaze related allegation has to be reported` etc. Emphasis should be given to `if`, and not `you`
03-11-2017, 07:15 PM
105
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
The Loonybyn didn't sack this one did he.https://news.sky.com/story/jeremy-co...pkins-11111200
03-11-2017, 07:23 PM
106
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
Originally Posted by Longdogs
->
The Loonybyn didn't sack this one did he.https://news.sky.com/story/jeremy-co...pkins-11111200
Dame Rosie Winterton rang the Labour leader's office to ask why Kelvin Hopkins had been appointed to the shadow cabinet in July 2016.
She reminded them that Mr Hopkins had been reprimanded for harassing a young activist, a Labour source said.
..looks like Corbyn was desperate to promote anyone to the shadow cabinet there were so few takers....
03-11-2017, 08:33 PM
107
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
Seems Old Compo Comrade Corbyn may have known about Kelvin Hopkins sexual harassment.https://www.newstatesman.com/politic...eremy-corbyn-0
Apparently "Rosie Winterton, the then-Chief Whip, flagged the accusations against Hopkins with the Labour leader’s office before Jeremy Corbyn went on to appoint Hopkins to the post of shadow secretary of state for culture, media and sport. "
Dear oh dear !
The moment Old Compo refuses to make comment:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/new...n-Hopkins.html
04-11-2017, 07:34 AM
110
Re: Name & Shame 'em!!!
HiPerhaps I am the odd one out here.
I can quite understand women being worried about going to the Police and reporting it, never easy and a source of embarrassment and publicity.
In the case of those in Parliament, reporting it to senior Politicians as it seems nothing was done.
Did they not have fathers and brothers they could talk to?
Persistent sexual harassment would result in a chat about the meaning of life with the offender concerned.
They would clearly understand what would happen if the behaviour continued or if they decided to sack the victim as a result of the little chat we were having.
That is a view not unique to me, it is one shared by many that I know.
|
|
