Re: Petulant Zionist Israel.
Originally Posted by
Puddle Duck
->
Porkina, I was not tiddly, thank you very much. That's your affliction , you assume too much and make a meal of it , when it's nothing to do with you. Cups of tea don't have that effect and I 've only read that smattering of your post, because I don't wish to read anymore. as the point I made is no longer up for discussion or argument in my ball park. It was simply a point in defence of humiliation towards the weak and suffering.
Puddled .. you're still sounding fuddled.
All this started because you showed crass insensitivity...
You could have said ...
What's more, Hitler was an atheist, that's what atheists do. They try to criticise people which ever way it makes them feel good about themselves
Instead , you said ...
Originally Posted by
Puddle Duck
->
What's more , Hitler was an atheist, that's what atheists do. They try to
crucify people which ever way it makes them feel good about themselves.
On a thread about Israel, religion, beliefs and believers in a divine godhead the two words have totally different connotations... particularly when including Hitler.
Next, after receiving a bit of a backlash you posted dictionary definitions claiming crucify and criticise have the same meaning ...
I can only assume you were trying to be witty .. humorous .. and engaging in a bit of crass and insensitive lampooning at Jews expense , which backfired.
Originally Posted by
Puddle Duck
->
Wrong. Two meanings for Crucify. = the one you obviously are thinking, and ....criticize (someone) severely and unrelentingly
Saying Atheists, Hitler, crucified people to make them feel good is on a par of a poor, tasteless witticism such as ...
Muslims, Isis, throw homosexuals off rooftops with gay abandon
or .. whilst in free fall ..
Full of gay pride the homosexual refused to convert.
You won't understand any of that, for if you did, you would appreciate how odd you look when you claim to be defending Christians , or against the humiliation of the weak and suffering.