Re: Tales from the mid 19th Century
Last of all the surgeons and Sweeting the policeman.
Mr. Septimus Tutin, of Ripon, surgeon. I was sent for to Marshall’s house, and informed that Marshall had drowned two of his children. When I arrived there, I found the bodies of the deceased; the boy, about eight years of age, was laid on his back on the bed; the other, a female child, about six or seven months old, was laid on a crib. Both were naked and had been dead for about three quarters of an hour. I examined them and it is my opinion that the children had died from suffocation, by being immersed in water. They had been dead so long before I saw them, that all attempts to restore animation would have been unavailing. In reference to Marshall; after having seen the bodies, I went down stairs to where Marshall was. He was sitting on a chair, and Lowley and another were holding him by the arms; I spoke to him, and said, “Marshall do you know me?” He gave me no answer, neither then nor after repeating the question several times; he appeared to be in quite a state of delirium; and totally unconscious of what was going on; I went from thence to the Mayor, and by his direction, Thomas Sweeting and another constable were called to the house in Low Skellgate. I ordered a strait waistcoat be put upon Marshall, as by now he was in a state of excitement almost approaching to delirium. I assisted in the putting on of the waistcoat. When he was secured, the police officers, escorted him to the House of Correction.
Mr. Alfred Smith, of Ripon, surgeon, also gave similar evidence; He said “I had been sent for on 30th May to attend Marshall. At that time I found him labouring under a degree of nervous excitement. It is my opinion that at the time of the murders he was insane. It should be noted that as the children had been immersed perpendicularly, it might have caused apoplexy, as well as suffocation.
Thomas Sweeting “I was one of the constables who apprehended Marshall. He was in a wild state. I asked him on the morning of the murder, if he knew what he had been doing. He said he had had a strong battle with a black cow, and he thought she would have beat him once, but he had got on the far side of her and beat her; she was a good cow and had come from Manchester.”
On the inquest, the prisoner, who had been present all the time, in custody of the Master of the House of Correction, and after having had the evidence of the witnesses read over to him, declined making any statement, and declared he should reserve any thing he had to say in his defence until he was put upon his trial. He also declined to sign his name to the examination.
The jury, immediately on the Coroner’s returning, unanimously found a verdict of Willful Murder in each case, against the prisoner, and he was committed to York Castle, to take his trial at the ensuing Assizes.
Neither from the evidence, nor from any other source, can his motives for the commission of the dreadful crime, be conjectured. The Venerable the Dean, in his sermon delivered in the Cathedral on Sunday, made a most eloquent appeal to the religious feelings of the congregation, in allusion to the awful event, and stated some particulars of a confession which he said the prisoner had made to him.