Welcome to Over50sForum! The site for people over 50 to chat, make friends, discuss, share, and generally be part of something that's fun and friendly :)
As One of the other candidates was the Arch Bishop of York, a person who would, had he been 'white', have to greater extent 'automatically' succeeded to the post, I wonder if the 'church' may have been guilty of racism???
The Archbishop of Canterbury leads the Church of ENGLAND!! John Sentamu has no claim to the post despite your "blinders on" lefty thinking, in fact he should never have been allowed to reach the position of Archbishop of York.
The Archbishop of Canterbury leads the Church of ENGLAND!! John Sentamu has no claim to the post despite your "blinders on" lefty thinking, in fact he should never have been allowed to reach the position of Archbishop of York.
What would you call a Left wing Activist who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance, ( Maggie springs to mind here ).
This is the state of mind of a bigot as defined by Merriam-Webster.
Oh come on!!!
I don't agree with a lot of Uncle Joe's sentiments and I think where political views are concerned we all have our own beliefs and opinions which we are entitled to hold and express. IMO in that respect politics and the politicians are fair game. I have never noticed Uncle Joe's posts to be racist. Strong opinions he has and I believe he is a champion of the underdog and working man as well as an idealist. A lot of his posts are accompanied by quite a degree of humour which makes me smile and I would not use the words racist or bigot to describe Uncle Joe.
The Archbishop of Canterbury leads the Church of ENGLAND!! John Sentamu has no claim to the post despite your "blinders on" lefty thinking, in fact he should never have been allowed to reach the position of Archbishop of York.
Would you care to explain Hu99 why you hold the opinion that Sentamu should not have been allowed to reach the position of Archbishop of York. I don't think the post of Archbishop of Canterbury is a role that can be "laid claim to" either, so I would welcome your response ?
Would you care to explain Hu99 why you hold the opinion that Sentamu should not have been allowed to reach the position of Archbishop of York. I don't think the post of Archbishop of Canterbury is a role that can be "laid claim to" either, so I would welcome your response ?
Don't bother Rena darlin' - he's a Fascist and beneath contempt!!!