Re: Dont know whats right/wrong
Originally Posted by
Bruce
->
Still peddling the same old rubbish.
Nope, just the same old peer reviewed scientific fact.
Originally Posted by
Bruce
->
Thimerosal is an organic mercury metabolised to Ethylmercury NOT methylmercury - the latter is the one that sent the hatters mad. On the other hand Ethylmercury is excreted from the body very quickly.
Your point here is at best a diversionary distraction. What matters is how long it is in the body for and what damage it is doing in that time.
Let's look at some FACTS
http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&gbv=1&ct=clnk
(This is a cached Google page because the actual page doesn't load for me)
EthylMercury Toxicity
"• Ethylmercury
is a neurotoxin."
• Infants may be more susceptible than adults.
• Ethylmercury is approximately 5 times less acutely toxic than methylmercury.
• Data are not adequate to compare potencies of
ethylmercury and methylmercury for developmental neurotoxicity.
•Ethylmercury is probably slightly less toxic than methylmercury.
• However, the database for ethylmercury is weak which creates considerable uncertainty in risk assessment comparisons.
• Ethylmercury should be considered equipotent to methylmercury as a developmental neurotoxin.
• This conclusion is clearly public health protective.
• Ethylmercury exposure from vaccines (added to dietary exposures to methylmercury) probably caused neurotoxic responses (likely subtle) in some children.
The half-life of Ethylmercury has been recorded at anywhere between 7 days and 30 days by various studies. That's a significant time to be in the body.
More here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publica..._methylmercury
"The neurotoxicity of etHg is similar to meHg in most "in vitro systems" but differences in the kinetics between these two compounds display differences in tested outcomes. However an immunotoxicity is more pronounced and more common for thimerosal etHg."
"etHG and meHg are different compounds and lead to different exposure levels and different toxicity risks.
Further detailed studies with low levels of simultaneous exposure to meHg and etHg are required to establish the hypothetical no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL)in experimental models using different endpoints of toxicity."
Summary: Ethylmercury has not been sufficiently tested and thus humans have been used as guineau pigs for a long time being repeatedly exposed to etHg (Thimerosal) in vaccines.
As you highlight ethylmercury metabolises into "inorganic mercury" but that's small consolation as inorganic mercury causes plenty of issues itself.
"Human Exposure and Health Effects of Inorganic and Elemental Mercury"
"Inorganic mercury compounds are water soluble with a bioavailability of 7% to 15% after ingestion; they are also irritants and cause gastrointestinal symptoms. Upon entering the body, inorganic mercury compounds are accumulated mainly in the kidneys and produce kidney damage"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514464/
and . . .
Mercury Toxicity
"Inorganic mercury causes cerebral infarctions, as well as systemic features, such as pneumonia, renal cortical necrosis, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy"
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1175560-overview
We could go on but it is largely pointless because you make no attempt to refute or counter the available peer reviewed facts.
The flu vaccine is irrefutably a complete con, a sham of epic proportions, pure snake oil, funding and fuelling a multi-billion dollar business.
There is no reason for anyone to have this vaccine and every reason to stay away from it as it can contain toxic mercury compounds that are insufficiently tested for safety and other toxic ingredients.