17-08-2017, 03:19 PM
51
Re: IMMIGRATION And BREXIT
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
Will someone explain to me how this can be?
How it works is this.
We have a completely bizarre interpretation of Human Rights Legislation, in particular the right to family life, Article 8.
You are an illegal, you come to the UK, you father a child, bingo.
It is the same with foreign criminals and terrorists.
It is so common there is a name for it, baby fathers.
It has naff all to do with the EU either, an extract from an article on the subject.
The real problem, however, is the way in which Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, the right to family life, is interpreted. It is quite wrong to think that the deportation of a criminal, particularly one convicted of a serious, violent crime such as rape or murder, must be a “disproportionate deprivation of family life”. It is not. And there is nothing in the European Convention on Human Rights that requires the right to family life be interpreted in so broad and, frankly, so ludicrous a way. The Government must ensure that British judges interpret this much abused right in the way that the framers of the convention intended.
The above Article was written in 2011, plenty of time to have resolved the issue.
17-08-2017, 06:50 PM
53
Re: IMMIGRATION And BREXIT
Originally Posted by swimfeeders
->
HiHow it works is this.
We have a completely bizarre interpretation of Human Rights Legislation, in particular the right to family life, Article 8.
You are an illegal, you come to the UK, you father a child, bingo.
It is the same with foreign criminals and terrorists.
It is so common there is a name for it, baby fathers.
It has naff all to do with the EU either, an extract from an article on the subject.
The real problem, however, is the way in which Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, the right to family life, is interpreted. It is quite wrong to think that the deportation of a criminal, particularly one convicted of a serious, violent crime such as rape or murder, must be a “disproportionate deprivation of family life”. It is not. And there is nothing in the European Convention on Human Rights that requires the right to family life be interpreted in so broad and, frankly, so ludicrous a way. The Government must ensure that British judges interpret this much abused right in the way that the framers of the convention intended.
The above Article was written in 2011, plenty of time to have resolved the issue.
17-08-2017, 07:08 PM
54
Re: IMMIGRATION And BREXIT
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
So how is a British citizen who is married and has children refused the right to family life in his own country?
Because the children are abroad and both he and his wife are abroad.
We make it incredibly difficult under such circumstances.
17-08-2017, 11:22 PM
55
Re: IMMIGRATION And BREXIT
"Originally Posted by nom
i voted out and immigration was only a small reason for doing so. Being part of an organisation that was reducing us too borg was not for me, each individual country has things to offer the whole, why not celebrate the difference and make sure all can benefit, a common market yes fedral europe no. "
Originally Posted by Twink55
->
+ 1
|
|
