Join for free
Page 8 of 8 « First < 6 7 8
JBR's Avatar
JBR
Chatterbox
JBR is offline
Cheshire, UK
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 32,785
JBR is male  JBR has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
23-02-2017, 11:07 AM
71

Re: Should voting be made compulsory?

I've yet to hear an argument which explains the advantages of compulsory voting.
Pumicestone's Avatar
Pumicestone
Senior Member
Pumicestone is offline
Australia
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,392
Pumicestone is male  Pumicestone has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
23-02-2017, 08:55 PM
72

Re: Should voting be made compulsory?

JBR - as Bruce and other Aussies have explained lucidly, there is no such thing as "compulsory voting".
Nobody can compel anyone to vote.

But here, people are required to turn up at a polling both and have their name checked off the Electoral Roll.
They are then given the wherewithal to cast a vote.
If they choose to write "Mickey Mouse" on the form - or chew it up for lunch - that is their call.

SO, the question might best be
"Should attending a Polling Booth on Election Day be compulsory ?"
Most Aussies say 'yes' because we have been led to believe that it is a duty - like jury service or paying tax.
It aims to reflect the wishes of the greatest number of people.

However, there are three levels of government - Federal, State and Local.
People are fined for not turning up for the first two.

In Queensland at least, they are rarely fined by Local Governments (Councils).
At my first meeting as a Shire Councillor many years ago,
I was astounded that the very first item on the agenda at the first post-election meeting, was whether non-voters would be prosecuted.
The majority of councillors voted against it.
The reason given was that it would not be cost-effective.
It would cost more to enforce and collect than would be raised in fines.
The real reason though - was that the new councillors feared a backlash at the NEXT election.
"Not gonna vote for that bastard, he fined me last time".
Tedc's Avatar
Tedc
Senior Member
Tedc is offline
Berkshire, UK
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 4,872
Tedc is male  Tedc has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
27-02-2017, 01:55 PM
73

Re: Should voting be made compulsory?

Originally Posted by JBR ->
I've yet to hear an argument which explains the advantages of compulsory voting.

There are those who claim that such a system would have made the Remainers sure-fire winners of the recent referendum!

JBR's Avatar
JBR
Chatterbox
JBR is offline
Cheshire, UK
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 32,785
JBR is male  JBR has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
27-02-2017, 02:14 PM
74

Re: Should voting be made compulsory?

Originally Posted by Tedc ->
There are those who claim that such a system would have made the Remainers sure-fire winners of the recent referendum!

Well if that is true, that's their own look out for being too lazy to vote.

I am one of those who believes that only those who want to vote should do so. If they don't, in my opinion they can't have felt very strongly about it.

As for compulsory voting, what do its proponents hope to achieve? If I didn't want to vote, or didn't feel very strongly about it, and was compelled to attend, I think I'd spoil my paper out of spite.

So what would they have achieved, other than wasting my time?
Tupman
Member
Tupman is offline
United Kingdom Surrey
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 78
Tupman is male  Tupman has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-03-2017, 07:06 PM
75

Re: Should voting be made compulsory?

If there was a "Non of the above" opposition.

It would win by a landside.
WE177B
Senior Member
WE177B is offline
London
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 101
WE177B is male  WE177B has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
08-03-2017, 04:55 PM
76

Re: Should voting be made compulsory?

Originally Posted by Tupman ->
If there was a "Non of the above" opposition.

It would win by a landside.

In some constituencies it probably would, where none of the candidates is worthy of election. So perhaps combine with a rule that if none of the above got the most votes all the existing candidates be disbarred from standing for election again for ? years. And then hold another election.
 
Page 8 of 8 « First < 6 7 8



© Copyright 2009, Over50sForum   Contact Us | Over 50s Forum! | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.