Re: Where's all the Jobs then?
Originally Posted by
plantman
->
However unfair it may seem Steve, an employer would much rather employ a non disabled person than a disabled one given the choice, for the obvious reasons of an employer's obligations to it's employees, and of course sometimes for genuine reasons of safety. The same goes now for women of child bearing age, since the introduction of so many maternity rights for women to the detriment of the employer, why would they employ another potential liability if an alternative was available? Running a business is tough enough without giving yourself avoidable liabilities.
I used to run a small plant hire and construction business and
I couldn't imagine how I could employ anyone who was less than 100% fit. Physical construction work adjacent to moving machinery is testing even for the able bodied with full sensory perception, but to anyone with a sensory disability such as yours would be downright dangerous, and even in the office any employee would require a hearing capability to deal with clients and enquiries.
I wish you luck with your continued quest but as I have said before your age and disability are bound to be huge factors to consider for a potential employer, but rant and rail all you like it is not their fault that you have them, just bad luck.
For once you have responded to my a post of mine in a more understanding way PM and I appreciate that.
The reasons, employers use arguing against employing disabled people are, in many cases, nothing whatsoever to do with any concerns over H&S but far more to do with ignorance and / or prejudice in my experience PM.
I am realistic these days and I know that my age and my deafness will prevent me from doing jobs where communication skills are essential but I have a whole range of skills and experience where I could easily do jobs that do
not require these communication skills but I'm effectively barred by the inflexible, blinkered attitude that still prevails towards all disabled people.
For example, in the three years I've been in my present job I've had just 3 consecutive days off sick.
The average in my department is now
5 weeks off sick, and I work for a Charity!
I also have the best attendance and punctuality record in my department.
Disabled people tend to be more reliable and conscientious too, simply because of the difficulty we face just trying to get work and keeping a job.
With employers, the ones I feel are the lowest of the low are those claiming to be users of the “
Double-tick” Positive About Disabled People Symbol which is government approved apparently yet very few of these employers have any employees with a disability.
I know, I've checked some of them out locally and people tell me it's the same almost everywhere.
As I said, the Disability Discrimination legislation has no teeth and there are no checks done by anyone regarding the employment of disabled people, which is scandalous in my opinion.
Remploy did great work and had many highly-skilled staff but the organisation has had funding cut so many times that many Remploy sites have had to close, throwing many vulnerable people onto a depressed jobs market where each job attracts 100+ applicants, mostly able-bodied.
To my mind the only fair way to help disabled people to help themselves is the Government's as our MPs are, supposedly, meant to represent and speak out for
all their constituents are they not?
What we get is the opposite where
every service that disabled people use faces cuts and closures yet we can miraculously find and spend Billions on major sporting events that provide no real lasting legacy to the local community except to big businesses.
A famous man once gave a very famous address and in the final paragraph he said "
government of the people, by the people, for the people"
In the UK we have Governments that serve Business first, to the detriment of every, single voter in the Union. stevmk2