Re: Churchill NZ under lockdown!
Originally Posted by
Julie1962
->
He had no justification nor did those people drive him to anything. He was a coward and a right wing terrorist. If a Muslim attacked you wouldn't be saying what justification he had so don't pretend you would.
The root cause that drove him to commit this crime was what he saw as the islamification of his culture with those who should be stopping it doing nothing.
But Right Wing?
Is to be patriotic right wing? Is to have national pride to be right wing? Is to want to defend ones national identity right wing? Is to want to take action against what he saw as representative group of a cult that used terrorism to be a terrorist?
Is to put your whole future life down the tubes as a sacrifice for what you believe is for the greatest good a coward?
Hardly.
But he was wrong. Not wrong in what he thought but wrong in the way that he addressed it. Totally wrong and very counter productive.
IMO what he should have done was to directly confront Islam, not the people under its thumb. Write a book - unless like Tommy Robinson you do and in spite of it being 100% factually correct it gets black balled by the major distributors.
Produce a film such as Fitna as Geert Wilders did. The uncensored version can still be found on t'web.
Or produce a series of short YouTube films such as Pat Condell has.
Now let's consider MY response when a Muslim attacks a group of people such as the infamous Manchester bombing.
Here I face a quandary because using the Qur'an and Hadith I can see how such a terrible act can be justified and is justified much as the rape and murder of the captured Yarzidi women is and has been and how the same (to us) evil source justified the abuse of our kids.