Re: Flexible extension???
Originally Posted by
Banchory
->
The first referendum was only advisory. The government have tried to find a solution that satisfies both the result of the referendum and the members of Parliament who are, whether you like or not, sovereign in our form of democracy. Parliament is at an impasse and as I’ve stated before but you’ve obviously failed to understand, putting the decision back to the country by way of a second referendum albeit this time legally binding is an equitable way of breaking the deadlock
Does that make me a hypocrite or does it make me a Realist?
Maybe you might be better posing your last question to Jacob Rees Mogg.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B3rX4nJ0snc
How would a second referendum solve anything ? Its legal status won't change the result and in case you haven't noticed we already triggered article 50.
The problem is parliament not history. It makes youna complete hypocrite because in one hand you say the referendum is only advisory but you want another one for some absurd reason.
Old arguments .... boring boring boring.....
Its because you can't accept the outcome of the first one and you want another vote so you can fudge the result to remain. Whether it was legal or not in the first place is irrelevant its just a big con because you can't face the result.
And you then claim parliament is sovereign after what we have witnessed over the past 3 years ?
The mind boggles ....