Re: Clinton v Trump

I see the FBI have announced they have found nothing to incriminate Clinton after their latest investigation of her e-mails.

Re: Clinton v Trump

He won't have enugh time to think up another diversion and name-blackening epidose now perhaps. Disgusting man.

Re: Clinton v Trump

Thought that was their religion they blamed for their bigotry on that occasion.

Re: Clinton v Trump

And I see that Trump is claiming it's a cover-up and if Clinton wins he will be refusing the result. Hmm... where have I seen that attitude before?

Re: Clinton v Trump

Alleged bigotry surely?

Re: Clinton v Trump

Its been to court so i would suggest its been proved. But unless we have to write alleged next to each post now im standing by what i said. Its christians like them get us all bad names.

Re: Clinton v Trump

Good thing I showed up here,Trump will win even though hillary escaped the F.B.I. this time,Trump is an ass but can be controlled while hillary's policy is secrecy,and lies if she does win she will be ineffective as the Republican's will stack the deck with Senators and Congressmen and the like so she will end up like Obama,Ineffective.So simply put The U.S. need's a friggen enema,political wise,Trump trounced the best 2 moron's the Republicans tried to spoon feed us,Cruz and Rubio,That pissed a lot of Republican's off,Trying to put those as our Representatives,for our Party.Obama and hillary have said G.B. will be punished for leaving the E.U.Back of the Bus if you Know what I mean. I can and Will vote for Trump,so will my Extended family, simply because we need Change.if for no other reason,sick and tired of cronyism in Government.

Re: Clinton v Trump

I suppose that directly equates to our PMs filling the House of Lords with their mates.

The House of Lords is very much like the Army used to be: you want a commission? Have you got enough money to buy one?

You want a peerage? How much money are you willing to contribute to my party?

Re: Clinton v Trump

Hi

I would love a peerage.

I have £26.72 in my change tin.

Any takers?

Re: Clinton v Trump

Why not ask TM? Mind you, the answer is likely to be a resounding NO.

Corbyn, Blair, even Cameron are different matters. They'd appoint Lords for nothing at all just in order to get their policies passed or refused as necessary.