Re: Margret Thatcher
Originally Posted by
Uncle Joe
->
Really Cate darlin??? - if that were so - then why would the Government (as they have just done) awarded Mrs Windsor (the most wealthiest woman in Western Europe) a pay rise of a further £5million (of
OUR money???
Name me one country which is doing so much better because it has a president and a senate. How about Germany??? - Prior to WW1 - it too had a monarchy - Kaiser Bill - they held a revolution in 1918, and did away with their Aristocracy. Austria also did away with their Aristocracy after WW1 too and they seem to be doing alright. There arev a number of other European nations who have also done away with their aristocracy who seem to be doing very well without them.
A Chancellor is not a President, Mrs President only has only control of certain parts of the German economy. It's debt ratio is higher than ours an it can't control it's own interest rates because they are governed by the European Central Bank. It only keeps it's triple A rating because both the rating agencies realise it is the central lone master for the Central European Bank. As far as doing better than Britain when Greece, Portugal, Italy, Cyprus and Ireland default on their loans the German tax payer gets a hike in their tax rates and a drop in their standard of living.
Don't get me started on Austria we were there when they told us how much money they had paid out for their transalpine railway system, only to be told by the EU that they could not operate it because it breached EU state support regulations.
Now give me one single example how the monarchy has any influence on a single economic policy in Britain and don't go on about her wage drop in real terms. She now pays for the running of Windsor Castle out of her own savings.