Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing
Originally Posted by
galty
->
Sorry but what a very nasty post.
What is 'nasty'about being pleased someone who posts 'frivolous posts' as someone in this thread calls them has returned and that I hope to see more
genuine frivolous threads, this is not one of them .
What is nasty to me was Ruthio bringing Tpins name into this thread and asking why I didn't 'tear into him' ...
This is the sequence of posts above...
Originally Posted by
Meg
->
Yes seriously, just read the thread title .
'' Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing''
Getting excited over the prospects of 'revelations' that haven't even happened and 'may' be exciting on some reality show really is rather pathetic and would probably not have happened three years ago .
That is my opinion if you don't like it you are free to ignore it Patsy.
Originally Posted by
Patsy
->
There are plenty of ridiculous or frivolous threads on here but I don't see the reaction Joe constantly gets
I am not in the least 'excited' - as you seem to be Meg
I recall many times, you telling us to 'ignore' a thread or post that is not to our liking - hence my post
Originally Posted by
ruthio
->
So Meg, why didn't you tear into Tpin with his frivolous and what some saw as thoroughly tedious and childish threads?
Originally Posted by
Meg
->
Where have I mentioned frivolous threads in this thread Ruthio, that was Patsy not I .
I see absolutely nothing wrong with frivolous threads, but what have they got to do with one person raking up every spec of dirt real or imagined that they can find about one particular political party practically on a daily basis .