Re: Zero Hedge.
Originally Posted by
Tachyon
->
Genuine question... If it just provides links to other articles and other sources of information, how does it differ from just going to those places anyway? Why is Zero Hedge needed?
Additionally, how do you know Zero Hedge isn't providing links in order to spoon feed their own agenda/crap to people? Is their brand of crap better than other sources of crap? Who decides what is crap and what isn't anyway?
I'm asking genuinely here and not trying to score points or whatever. I have a deep distrust of people saying their brand of the truth (or religion, politics, news, etc.) is The Right One and that everyone else is full of crap.
Zero Hedge is a compilation of news stories regarding the USA but it also covers other parts of the world too. There is a fair bit published about Europe. It generally picks up a news article and writes about it with links to the source. It also publishes articles by bloggers and other authors from around the world.
It was mainly to report financial news on the markets etc but broadened its scope over recent years to cover other news items. If you read a lot of the articles there are links to the sources (including the Guardian and New York Times, Daily Mail etc) but also publishes its own articles by "Tyler Durden" (after the character in the film Fight Club).
So, where the Guardian, Mail, Express all publish articles according to their own political bias, Zero Hedge publishes all the ones it thinks are news worthy - and of course it has its own bias (towards the right) but on balance I think it does itself a lot of favours by publishing stuff from left wing sources too.
Have a read and make your own mind up - a lot of the articles you won't find in the MSM because the MSM turns a blind eye to a lot of stuff that's out there (for obvious reasons).