Re: Nz & oz fta??
Originally Posted by
7779311
->
Thank you Solasch for your detailed explanation. I wanted to point out that expecting a treaty to take effect does not necessarily mean that it is "done and ready". Am I right?
It was I think "Bread" who pointed out the other day that the FTA between Japan and the EU is not ready and ratified. Still it "entered into force" in Feb. 2019.
Maybe I am confusing things but all I want to say is that I would not bet all my money on those treaties yet.
No, it is bread confusing things. As usual our young friend mixes up things. In this case the EPA and the SPA.
On 1 february 2019, the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) entered into force. Rightly described as a ‘mega-deal’, since it covers 27.8 per cent of the world economy and more than a third of global world trade, the event still received relatively little attention. Yet the deal truly matters both economically and politically, especially at a time when most headlines are made by the fallout of President’s Trump ‘America First’ policies and UK-EU wrangling over Brexit.
The economic significance of the
EPA is self-evident. It substantially lowers barriers to trade between the largest (EU) and fourth largest (Japan) markets globally. Combined, the markets involve 635 million people. The agreement eases access of European firms into a country that is still perceived by many as highly protective. In 2017, EU trade in goods posted a deficit of 8.4 € billion with exports to Japan worth 60.5 € billion and imports valued at 68.9 € billion. In particular, EU producers of agricultural products, pharmaceuticals and medical equipment stand to benefit. The EPA also makes it easier for European firms to bid on large-scale infrastructure projects in Japan.
It is no coincidence that alongside the EPA, EU and Japan have also agreed on a
Strategic Partnership (SPA). Both agreements emphasize ‘common principles and values’, and indeed signal a continued commitment to liberal democracy, multilateralism and a rule-based economic order. The EPA recognises the relevance of the WTO. It confirms the commitment of both parties to sustainable development, including the Paris agreement on climate change. On cyber issues, the EU and Japan persist in maintaining a free, open and accessible internet, based on a multi-stakeholder, rather than government controlled, governance model. Going against the grain, the EU and Japan have stuck to a discourse valuing multilateralism over bilateral deals, and internationalism over nationalism.
Already in 2001, the EU and Japan agreed an Action Plan for Cooperation. The dialogue on the EPA started in 2011, and from 2013 negotiations were endorsed by all 28 EU member states. Ratification and implementation of the EPA,
and main parts of the SPA, however, has been swift taking less than six months.
Herein lies bread's misunderstanding. All of the trading deal EPA is in effect (working, rarified), but the SPA only in part. If you confuse the two, and it is a difficult field of course, you get a discussion like with bread. Therefore I keep advising bread to educate.