21-03-2016, 01:53 PM
31
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Nom
->
Guantanamo Detainees (02/13/2004)775 detainees have been brought to Guantanamo. Although most of these have been released without charge, the United States government continues to classify many of these released detainees as "enemy combatants". As of January 2016, 93 detainees remain at Guantanamo.
21-03-2016, 05:44 PM
32
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
They are dangerous terrorists ......
What evidence has been produced in what court ?
What lawyers or civil rights folk have been provided with details of their offences ?
Where has this data been published ?
Of course, it is not remotely possible that any of these blokes have information which the Yanks would never, ever wish to have made public ?
That couldn't possibly be one reason for their illegal, immoral and inhumane confinement ?
Muddy simply "knows" that they are all "dangerous terrorists".
All of the detainees were called the 'worst of the worst' by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld - all proven liars.
Those British and Australians (and others) who have been released do not seem to fit that label.
21-03-2016, 06:09 PM
34
Re: Guantanamo
HiIf Obama manages to close the place I will be happy.
The problem is, that in spite of all those who think that all the inmates are totally innocent and should be released, many of the Governments of their own Countries where they could be returned to do not consider them whiter than white and will kill them on their return.
That is why some of them are refusing to leave, and there are great problems finding other Countries to take them.
It is right mess, yet another legacy of Bush Junior.
21-03-2016, 07:15 PM
35
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Pumicestone
->
How do you know ???What evidence has been produced in what court ?
What lawyers or civil rights folk have been provided with details of their offences ?
Where has this data been published ?
Of course, it is not remotely possible that any of these blokes have information which the Yanks would never, ever wish to have made public ?
That couldn't possibly be one reason for their illegal, immoral and inhumane confinement ?
Muddy simply "knows" that they are all "dangerous terrorists".
All of the detainees were called the 'worst of the worst' by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld - all proven liars.
Those British and Australians (and others) who have been released do not seem to fit that label.
21-03-2016, 07:35 PM
36
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Advantage Out
->
You see now Pumice, this is so ****** typical of you. We are talking about the lives of nearly a thousand men, who have been detained without charge and tortured by an illegal entity. So illegal in fact that it isn't even allowed on American soil proper. And there you sit demanding proof of their guilt. What an idealist you are! I'll bet you believe democracy is a good idea too! You exasperate me beyond description! But he's right, these people have been detained illegally without adequate legal representation, and tortured contrary to their human rights. If they are/were guily of an illegal act, then try them and let a properly constituted court and jury determine their guilt or innocence according to law.
21-03-2016, 08:14 PM
38
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Uncle Joe
->
But he's right, these people have been detained illegally without adequate legal representation, and tortured contrary to their human rights. If they are/were guily of an illegal act, then try them and let a properly constituted court and jury determine their guilt or innocence according to law.
21-03-2016, 08:16 PM
39
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
91 actually
|
|
