Re: Supreme Court nominee accused
Originally Posted by
Barry
->
Sorry Sugarbug, but I was amused by the contradiction between this post and your signiature ...
Regarding the case though, surely there is a hell of a difference between a drunken teenage grope at a party and a lifetime of abusing women. I don't care what you say, there can't be many blokes or women that haven't been to a party like that, but virtually non of us turned out to be serial sex abusers. I would venture that most of us went on to live decent lives, and the stupid drunken fumble of an immature teen should not define us for the rest of our lives. But if this experience was really so traumatising then why on earth has it taken 36 years for her to say so? The whole charade is bloody ridiculous ....
Barry you are right, I am contradicting myself.
There is always an exception to every rule .
Barry have you any daughters , if you do .
Young blokes groping them, would be acceptable in your
book, because they were teenagers .
Sorry , If some bloke touches my daughter .
against her will . I couldn't forgive ..
so I guess I can't love .. what can I say you are so right, there is contradicting on my part .