29-11-2017, 12:30 PM
41
Re: Katie Hopkins
Originally Posted by swimfeeders
->
HiI am sure it does not JBR.
Morning Star Journalists are Public School Rich Kids.
The only ones who can afford to be Communists.
Wow, there's hope for him yet.
29-11-2017, 07:22 PM
42
Re: Katie Hopkins
Originally Posted by Uncle Joe
->
Well, if one does employ neanderthals, one must expect the odd spelling mistake or grammatical error.
N.B. You've made a spelling mistake yourself. Neanderthal is spelled with a capital N.
30-11-2017, 09:46 PM
43
Re: Katie Hopkins
Originally Posted by JBR
->
Hear hear.I read the Mail Online virtually every night in bed before I fall asleep. After all, it is free.
The one thing that makes me despair, though, is the very high frequency of spelling mistakes. I'm not alone either. When you read the readers' comments, you can guarantee that there will be several justified criticisms especially bearing in mind that the authors call themselves journalists.
The impression I get is that they are young people newly graduated with a 'meeja studies' degree.
Just to prove that I am not really such a tight-fisted bugger, we really lash out on the printed copy of the Mail every Saturday without fail. That's a whole English pound every week.
It said - "Hopkins didn't write a column for The Mail. She wrote for the Mail-online". It's the Mail-online (it seems) that so many complain about. Last I heard they only had 30 staff and they probably come very young, inexperienced and cheap and NOT on Littlejohn money (or anything like it). They are probably paid less than the poor beggars at The Guardian.
Even James O'Brien (LBC and Newsnight) the mass unfettered immigration activist and hater of The Conservative Party has admitted on a number of occasions that The Mail is clearly the best paper - because they have the best journalists. (That was before the Brexit vote though - he's still spitting blood and hate since then)
The Mail-online is read by all manner of parasitical low-life that infest the internet.
Saturday's Mail is particularly excellent value for money, though.
|
|
