22-03-2016, 11:42 AM
61
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Advantage Out
->
I'd love to smuggle in 93 Kalashnikovs and a pallet of hand grenades to those poor men. Then we'll see what's what.
you could be sitting next to some of those you are trying to defend.Oh if you manage to achieve your goal there would be 94 bodies lying in spreading pools of their own blood,you being one,I say go for it,I mean your already turning gay why not go out with a bang.
22-03-2016, 12:28 PM
63
Re: Guantanamo
Sorry. I was about to say ….. with such simpleton minds it's no wonder there are so many willing to start and perpetuate wars and conduct illegal facilities such as Guantanamo. I would have said it in my last post but the CIA were banging on my door to arrest me so I had to cut my reply very short. They confiscated the 79 Kalashnikovs, and the pallet of hand grenades I was saving for a rainy day. They would have carted me off to Guantanamo but the CIA owe me a few favour, (unbeknownst to the agents who showed up on my door step) but once it was confirmed by the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia they gave me back my arsenal, apologised, and went on their way. I looked out the window as they drove off and I must say I am impressed by their civilian-marked HUMVEE with the number plate “ME-BIG 1”
22-03-2016, 01:21 PM
64
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Advantage Out
->
Pity about the PM. I wrote it in an earnest and friendly manner. There is a definite problem here that cannot be denied. I'd prefer to sort it out and bury it, but I refuse to wash it in public.
My inferior intellectual capacity wouldn't allow for any meaningful exchange.
Besides that I don't agree with much of what you say and vice versa, I'm sure.
22-03-2016, 02:16 PM
65
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Tpin
->
...... My inferior intellectual capacity .....
22-03-2016, 04:39 PM
67
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by DragonsRealm
->
Boy are you ignorant ........ your already turning gay why not go out with a bang.
Really thought you were bright enough to explore different opinions
without resorting to that sort of stuff.
No doubt a Forum Rule or two have gone down the gurgler in that post but shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
(we won't tell anyone).
22-03-2016, 04:51 PM
68
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Tpin
->
AOYour reply "probably the vocabulary was too advanced" suggests you are ridiculing my intellect.
Either your humour has by-passed me or you are forgetful, I'm not sure which.
22-03-2016, 05:13 PM
70
Re: Guantanamo
Originally Posted by Advantage Out
->
A joke, a jab, a smile, a frown, none of it is meant to ridicule your intellect. I can't always agree with you, but it certainly does not mean that I don't respect you. You ought to have understood by now, with all the shared convictions we've had on a variety of subjects, that I have no reason to ridicule your intellect. Let's put it behind us.
Originally Posted by ruthio
->
Tiepin aren't you meant to be on holiday?????Shut up arguing and take a break for pity's sake... get some sun, get laid, whatever...but GO!!!!
|
|
