09-09-2014, 10:08 PM
71
Re: A new Royal baby!
Originally Posted by AudreyII
->
Thank you for the answer.. One more question.. At one time weren't they banned from ever marrying "Commoners"?I think I recall reading that the Royals had a very limited gene pool to select from, and this caused some medical and mental problems.. Didn't it change then? I think it's great, it strengthens the blood line to have diversity.
Yes you are right about the limited gene pool , one bad gene that got passed down from Queen Victoria was Haemophilia that got passed on to The Russian Tsar Son which was well documented and he suffered badly with it ..
11-09-2014, 09:27 AM
75
Re: A new Royal baby!
Originally Posted by sue_arnold
->
O I see.... so you think theres only ONE of these people in the UK with 15 children.There are thousands so add that to your figure of 56k
According to your Work and Pensions Secretary of State Iain Duncan Smith there are about 160 families claiming the dole who have 10 (note, not 15) or more children.
I am afraid the 'thousands' of such families are just a figment of your fevered imagination. But hey! why let facts get in the way of a deeply held prejudice?
11-09-2014, 09:42 AM
76
Re: A new Royal baby!
Originally Posted by Bruce
->
Ha ha ha... You type the most abominable drivel sometimes. Do you just pluck a figure out of the air?According to your Work and Pensions Secretary of State Iain Duncan Smith there are about 160 families claiming the dole who have 10 (note, not 15) or more children.
I am afraid the 'thousands' of such families are just a figment of your fevered imagination. But hey! why let facts get in the way of a deeply held prejudice?
|
|
