16-03-2017, 04:12 PM
41
Re: Additions and changes to our Mod team
Originally Posted by Julie1962
->
The problem IMO with asking for volunteers not many people who would be best at the job have the ego to actually say me me. I think we need to suggest and see who on the list actually wants to go forward.
16-03-2017, 06:12 PM
44
Re: Additions and changes to our Mod team
Originally Posted by Meg
->
Mups 
Azz's post says..It is asking for people to put themselves forward ...
That's what I meant Meg, just didn't phrase it very well, sorry.
That's why I said about the " it's who volunteers that counts."
It's no good us nominating someone who doesn't even want the job.
16-03-2017, 06:14 PM
45
Re: Additions and changes to our Mod team
Originally Posted by Julie1962
->
The problem IMO with asking for volunteers not many people who would be best at the job have the ego to actually say me me. I think we need to suggest and see who on the list actually wants to go forward.
I don't think that would work Julie as I tried to explain before.
Thing is, what happens if nobody at all wants the job in the end? What will happen then?
16-03-2017, 06:18 PM
46
Re: Additions and changes to our Mod team
Originally Posted by Nom
->
Did the last two times extra mods were asked for not generate enough volunteers. ?
16-03-2017, 06:31 PM
47
Re: Additions and changes to our Mod team
Originally Posted by May
->
I don't recall there ever being any volunteers over the last couple of years Nom,but the Forum Membership has grown since then..We'll just have to wait and see if There are any Saints among Them
16-03-2017, 06:40 PM
48
Re: Additions and changes to our Mod team
Originally Posted by myrtle
->
May ... Azz has twice put forward a suggestion regarding additional moderators within the last year or so ... the idea seemed to disappear into the ether ??????
16-03-2017, 06:43 PM
49
Re: Additions and changes to our Mod team
In any situation like this, one rarely gets the best person for the job.You get the person who puts their hand up.
I'm a bit surprised that a mere "supervisor" apparently ranks above a 'GLOBAL Moderator'.
Perhaps they are to be UNIVERSAL or GALACTIC 'supervisors' .... ?
|
|
