Join for free
Page 3 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 13 > Last »
Purwell
Chatterbox
Purwell is offline
North Herts, England
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 6,576
Purwell is male  Purwell has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 03:11 PM
21

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Meg ->
Impartial when it comes to modding Ruthio but that doesn't mean as a member I have to sit back and put up with daily doses of spite and bitterness dished out by another member without comment.

I don't belong to any political party but am aware we have members of all political persuasions here but only one lot post daily with spite and venom about one party. I am just glad I don't belong to the left wing spiteful party they give the left a bad name .
Maybe you "lot" would prefer to talk among yourselves?
Wrinkly
Fondly Remembered
Wrinkly is offline
West Yorks.
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,427
Wrinkly is male  Wrinkly has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 03:13 PM
22

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Meg ->
Read the post above Ruthio , that says to me Wrinkley is a fan of spiteful gossip, he says it intrigues him .
Meg you have it wrong, read my post again I said

My point is you can see who posted it,so if you know whats coming why read it, it must intrigue us to read all Geoff's posts even when we know whats coming.
It is people like Geoff, who keep a forum and debating alive and thriving, long may it last.

The important word has just 2 letters US not me.
Meg's Avatar
Meg
Supervisor
Meg is offline
Worcestershire
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 42,850
Meg is female  Meg has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 03:42 PM
23

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Wrinkly ->

The important word has just 2 letters US not me.
Priceless Wrinkley.... so 'us' doesn't include 'you' ...

The definition of 'Us'
us

pronoun
1.
used by a speaker to refer to himself or herself and one or more other people
Nom
Chatterbox
Nom is offline
Northumberland
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,118
Nom is male  Nom has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 03:54 PM
24

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

And has your constant attacks on this poster yielded any change then.....no

Probably has the opposite effect, red rag to a bull. He is just pointing out that we are being led by a bunch of duplicitous vermin. of course those that support them come out like a lynch mob,. Attack or defend the post if you must but unless you to control everything suggest you call off the witch hunt.
Patsy
Chatterbox
Patsy is offline
UK
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 31,549
Patsy is female  Patsy has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 05:32 PM
25

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Meg ->
Priceless Wrinkley.... so 'us' doesn't include 'you' ...

The definition of 'Us'

Seriously ?
I don't know what has changed here, but when I joined this forum Joe was here too
I never saw this kind of reaction in those 3 years, people would have a laugh and banter with him but this constant reaction has saddened me greatly, which is why I rarely post now
If you don't like a post or thread - IGNORE it - instead of repeating the same lines time and again
ruthio
Chatterbox
ruthio is offline
Southern UK
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 11,732
ruthio is female  ruthio has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 05:49 PM
26

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Well said Patsy.
There's only one person introducing and using the phrase "spiteful gossip"...if that's how you see it then don't participate, and when you're in a hole stop digging!
Meg's Avatar
Meg
Supervisor
Meg is offline
Worcestershire
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 42,850
Meg is female  Meg has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 07:33 PM
27

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Patsy ->
Seriously ?
I don't know what has changed here, but when I joined this forum Joe was here too
I never saw this kind of reaction in those 3 years, people would have a laugh and banter with him but this constant reaction has saddened me greatly, which is why I rarely post now
If you don't like a post or thread - IGNORE it - instead of repeating the same lines time and again
Yes seriously, just read the thread title .
'' Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing''

Getting excited over the prospects of 'revelations' that haven't even happened and 'may' be exciting on some reality show really is rather pathetic and would probably not have happened three years ago .

That is my opinion if you don't like it you are free to ignore it Patsy.
Patsy
Chatterbox
Patsy is offline
UK
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 31,549
Patsy is female  Patsy has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 07:43 PM
28

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Meg ->
Yes seriously, just read the thread title .
'' Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing''

Getting excited over the prospects of 'revelations' that haven't even happened and 'may' be exciting on some reality show really is rather pathetic and would probably not have happened three years ago .

That is my opinion if you don't like it you are free to ignore it Patsy.
There are plenty of ridiculous or frivolous threads on here but I don't see the reaction Joe constantly gets
I am not in the least 'excited' - as you seem to be Meg
I recall many times, you telling us to 'ignore' a thread or post that is not to our liking - hence my post
Meg's Avatar
Meg
Supervisor
Meg is offline
Worcestershire
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 42,850
Meg is female  Meg has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 07:51 PM
29

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Patsy ->
There are plenty of ridiculous or frivolous threads on here but I don't see the reaction Joe constantly gets
I am not in the least 'excited' - as you seem to be Meg
I recall many times, you telling us to 'ignore' a thread or post that is not to our liking - hence my post
Why should I ignore a thread on which I wish to express an opinion.
Rainmaker's Avatar
Rainmaker
Senior Member
Rainmaker is offline
North Midlands UK
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,541
Rainmaker is male  Rainmaker has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
05-06-2016, 07:51 PM
30

Re: Oooohhh - her revelations may be embarassing

Originally Posted by Patsy ->
[/B]
Seriously ?
I don't know what has changed here, but when I joined this forum Joe was here too
I never saw this kind of reaction in those 3 years, people would have a laugh and banter with him but this constant reaction has saddened me greatly, which is why I rarely post now
If you don't like a post or thread - IGNORE it - instead of repeating the same lines time and again
Perhaps because everyone thought like him and nobody objected.

When some people on here stop calling someone with a different opinion scum or barstewards or implying that they are unfeeling, cruel, unkind and all the other uncomplimentary things the left wing supporters churn out. Or deliberately digging out links to derogatory articles or even worse spin and lies, I'll then ignore it. Until then I'll continue to speak my peace. In my opinion it is the equivalent of the school bully.

Tell me, when do you and your friends ever complain when someone objects to being treated disrespectfully? Why do you always leap to the defence of the offender?
 
Page 3 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 13 > Last »



© Copyright 2009, Over50sForum   Contact Us | Over 50s Forum! | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.