Reply to the (ironically named?) Realist.
Your post demonstrates your anger, for sure, but also how poor your judgement has become. There is no dictatorship. There no usurping of democracy. You have got yourself confused in your passion. The efforts are to prevent a no deal exit. And remember, no one voted for a no deal exit. To impose a no deal exit, when that is not what was voted for in 2016, that would be a travesty of democracy. Focus on that, please.
Let me explain with an example. Say a room full of people were asked whether they wanted sandwiches or salad for lunch. Everyone has to have the same. Out of 100 people, 52 say they’d prefer sandwiches. So everyone is now expecting to get sandwiches for lunch. The 48 are not happy and do complain. But they have to accept that its sandwiches for lunch – besides, the 52 point out, some of the sandwiches might have bits of salad in them. So stop moaning. Then, just before lunch, it’s announced by 2 of the 52 that in fact sandwiches are not possible. Instead the only choice possible for lunch is bits of bread. And the 98 should not complain because we voted for a bread based lunch and that’s what we’re going to get. The 48 are very angry now. The want to stop lunch completely and go back to getting a salad. They point out that the vote was between sandwiches, no doubt with lovely fillings, or salad. Compared to bits of bread they are beginning to think that sandwiches might be ok, but salad would still be better. No, no, no say the 2 who announced the bits of bread lunch, we all voted and the majority clearly voted for a bread based lunch and that’s what we are getting. Strangely now, quite a lot of the other 50 who voted for sandwiches are now convinced that they voted for just bread. They are angry with those who are trying to stop them getting bread for lunch. Strange, because they actually voted for sandwiches. That’s you, that is.

17.4 million people voted to leave the EU - with or without a deal.

498 MPs voted to trigger A50 - to leave with or without a deal

Majority in Parliament voted in favour of the withdrawal bill - to leave with or without a deal.

No deal is better than a bad deal was repeated over and over in the election by the Tories and Farage.

Conservative and Labour manifestos state they will respect the decision of the people.

What on earth are you talking about when we said we did not vote to leave with "no deal" ???

Second part - how to you remove Juncker or Tusk ? You can't - they are appointed and cannot be deselected. If you want dictatorship look no further than the EU.

You are getting as pink faced as Realist. The 2016 leave campaign, the 17m voted you refer to, was explicit in avoiding any dialogue about the possibility of a no deal exit. It was clearly not a vote winner so the focus was on how easy it would be to get a great deal. That was the basis of the leave vote. Please do not try to re-write events to suit your current narrative.
(And please do not distract by introducing notions about how the chair of the council is voted for. Not a dictatorship.)

Blah blah blah.
There was no vote for leaving without a deal.
You've clearly convinced yourself that it did happen. So I suggest you sit in a quiet place with own happy thoughts.

17.4 million people voted to leave the EU with or without a deal. There was no deal on offer at the time of the referendum - we cannot vote for something that does not exist.

I'm loving it in my happy corner.....

There was no vote to leave without a deal, end of story.

There was no deal to vote for in the first place. Like I said - it didn't exist