Re: Brexit NI Backstop Resolution Proposal
We don't need a 'backstop' because we don't need any changes to the border between southern and northern Ireland as I already said in a post yesterday.Re: Brexit NI Backstop Resolution Proposal
Re: Brexit NI Backstop Resolution Proposal
Re: Brexit NI Backstop Resolution Proposal
Unfortunately, it needs someone who believes in Brexit to tell the EU the backstop is dead in the water unless it has written into it, the same rights for the UK as the EU have ensured they have, and that the 27 EU nations NEVER have the right to use the backstop if it comes into use as a leverage for blackmailing the UK. I.E. - Gibraltar and Fishing Rights.Re: Brexit NI Backstop Resolution Proposal
HiRe: Brexit NI Backstop Resolution Proposal
Re: Brexit NI Backstop Resolution Proposal
Many thanks for all the interest and for the helpful comments, it's appreciated. Could I ask you to let me know whether you see anything wrong with the proposal - the reason I ask is because it seems a straightforward way of resolving the Backstop issue but I don't recall any politician ever mentioning it - odd because it seems obvious unless there is some major flaw! To summarise, under the Backstop section in the Withdrawal Agreement Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK are treated differently and the DUP in NI can't accept this, which is understandable - so, therefore, extend the NI arrangements to the rest of the UK - the DUP would accept that. The other issue is that any one of the 27 Member States can block a free trade deal and any one of the Member States can also block our exit from the Backstop if it were ever triggered. By extending the NI arrangement to the rest of the UK we would continue to get the benefits of the Customs Union and the Single Market (because that is what NI will be getting to make sure there is no hard border between the North and South of Ireland). The EU has said it is very unlikely the Backstop would need to be triggered - in which case, what is their problem in agreeing the proposal? If other Member States wanted to try to blackmail the UK, for example, by saying they won't let us exit the Backstop until we agreed to their fishing demands (France) or Gibraltar (Spain) they wouldn't get much support in the EU because the UK would be enjoying the benefits of the Customs Union and Single Market while achieving its other aims of controlling our borders, our laws and our money. The proposal tips the balance more in the UK's favour because, at present, we would be at the mercy of any one of the 27. Sorry to go on but I would really appreciate it if you can see any flaws in the proposal because, as I've said, I don't recall it ever being put forward by any politician.
|