Re: Article 10 NI protocol
Originally Posted by
Bread
->
The friction on trade is a breach of WTO rules by the EU. These are pedantic, childish measures that are not necessary. Thankfully, the EU have now seen sense and are no longer frustrating borders.
To think that overnight, the 27 members states decided no longer to buy goods from the UK because of Brexit is nonesense. There may have been a delay in goods going to the EU for a number of reasons including.
1. UK manufacturers not producing goods due to the pandemic, furloughing staff and transport issues due to COVID-19 and infections.
2. Stockpiling on the EU side due to Brexit (unnecessarily as it turned out)
3. Broken supply chains - take the Suez Canal that got blocked - there has been a big dip in trade because parts and components were stuck in the Suez Canal (PS5 stock for example).
There was no friction on trade by the EU only the friction introduced by leaving the single market and customs Union which is totally down to Brexit.
In case you hadn’t noticed, we are not trading with the EU on WTO rules, we are trading under the terms of the trade agreement we have negotiated. So what Breach of WTO rules?
Many small EU companies who make low value sales direct to the U.K. have decided that they didn’t want to register for UK VAT and act as collection agents so have ceased trading with the U.K.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-and-...mers-in-the-uk
There are companies who undertake JIT manufacturing sourcing elsewhere.
First you state the that UK manufacturers were not producing goods
Then you say the EU were stockpiling goods we didn’t produce?
Have you used the same logic as the case for Brexit?
Please enlighten me as to how the blockage of the Suez Canal which, incidentally happened on 23rd March, disrupted trade between the EU and the U.K. in January and February?