29-09-2019, 12:28 PM
21
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by keezoy
->
"Many don't post anywhere else and have made some rather superior observations about the rest of the forum so I doubt it very much."I have nothing to comment on Brexit. But regarding your comment. People who think they are superior are often not. Check this....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunnin...3Kruger_effect
29-09-2019, 05:35 PM
22
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by keezoy
->
"Many don't post anywhere else and have made some rather superior observations about the rest of the forum so I doubt it very much."I have nothing to comment on Brexit. But regarding your comment. People who think they are superior are often not. Check this....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunnin...3Kruger_effect
effect Keezoy??
donkeyman! PS, correct me if lm wrong , but isnt it about
superiority and inferiority cmplexes??
Regards Donkeyman!
30-09-2019, 07:47 AM
23
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by Donkeyman
->
Do you think Dunning & Kruger were suffering from thiseffect Keezoy??
donkeyman! PS, correct me if lm wrong , but isnt it about
superiority and inferiority cmplexes??
Regards Donkeyman!
Answer 2. No.
30-09-2019, 02:09 PM
24
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by keezoy
->
Answer 1. Haha I don't know them personally. So I wouldn't have a clue. They are psychologists who conducted experiments and enquiries based on the scientific method. THeir results should be repeatable and testable. Others can judge them personally.Answer 2. No.
in phycology, but l find the subject interesting?
Perhaps you could enlighten me as to what conclusions they
came to?
I think they wrote it for the benefit of other phycologists?
Regards Donkeyman!
30-09-2019, 02:18 PM
25
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by Longdogs
->
Perhaps we should stop them leaving? 
30-09-2019, 09:31 PM
27
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by Donkeyman
->
I had to decypher their findings KZ as l am only an amatuerin phycology, but l find the subject interesting?
Perhaps you could enlighten me as to what conclusions they
came to?
I think they wrote it for the benefit of other phycologists?
Regards Donkeyman!
01-10-2019, 02:15 PM
28
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by keezoy
->
Well mate, I suggest you start by reading the article on Wiki. -That's why I posted it - then if that's not enough, go to the bottom and read the references. This was just meant to be an aside to one comment made here and kind of grew on it's own. It's off topic really but that's my suggestion. And yes of course they wrote it to further the psychology knowledge base. Most research in all disciplines is carried out to contribute to the knowledge base of that particular profession. Everything from Lancet to the Plumbers journal.
due to the way it was written,perhaps l am particularly dense?
But l do believe you could have chosen a more comprehensible
article for your illustration??
Regards Donkeyman!
01-10-2019, 02:51 PM
29
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by Donkeyman
->
I did read it KZ, But could not really take much info from itdue to the way it was written,perhaps l am particularly dense?
But l do believe you could have chosen a more comprehensible
article for your illustration??
Regards Donkeyman!
In the past the brits had an empire. They considered the indiginous people inferior to every brit. Now that empire has died.
Now the brits are an indiginous people part of a new conglomerate of countries. They still consider themselves superior to the other members. That's dunning-kruger.
01-10-2019, 03:13 PM
30
Re: Posts on B topic?
Originally Posted by Solasch
->
Perhaps an example will help.In the past the brits had an empire. They considered the indiginous people inferior to every brit. Now that empire has died.
Now the brits are an indiginous people part of a new conglomerate of countries. They still consider themselves superior to the other members. That's dunning-kruger.
know we have been mongrels for centuries!
Donkeyman!
|
|
