Re: The European Election: Results
Originally Posted by
Banchory
->
So, just as Itsme suspected, you don’t know and you keep on suggesting people “google up” answers and then don’t like them when they do.
The simple fact is that those who advocate leaving without a deal cannot put together a cohesive argument of just how we will benefit by doing so.
In you own so call field of expertise and according to a good friends daughter who works in pharmaceutical research it will result in us being rule takers not makers as we will need to align with the regularity standards of others as no pharmaceutical company is going to bother with the expense of aligning with any UK only standards that may emerge in the future. So rather than taking back control we will lose it
Do, how about some verifiable facts as to how the UK will benefit from leaving?
I've explained these answers over and over again. Why do I need to keep telling you ? That's not refusing to answer at all - there are only 2 people on here who refuse to answer questions and that's you and your mate
All you can do is Google up answers at the last minute (because you don't already know) and then cut and paste somebody elses opinion. When you are asked for your own opinion or the truth behind them you refuse to answer because firstly, you cant Google up your own opinion and secondly it will reveal a lot more about your weak arguments than you dare to admit.
And if you want to know about the pharma industry just ask me - I can tell you exactly how it works. We have always been rule takers and so has the EU - from the FDA in the USA. I'll leave you to Google up why that is. If, however, you want to find out who are the architects of GxP then look no further than the UK.