25-09-2019, 09:27 AM
101
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Well I don't care what anyone says, the three people who brought this case to the Supreme Court did so in a way to stifle or stop Brexit .Gina Miller ,Joanna Cherry, and John Major.
There is another person involved in this, and that is HRH Queen Elizabeth II .
Has anyone given a thought to how that may pan out in the future.
Will the Monarch be given more power to scrutinise her ministers, will the Monarch be able to dismiss ministers ? Without saying it in so many words, the courts HAVE overruled the Head of State. So WHO are the courts answerable to ?
This is like a page out of the history books.
I think it's very serious for the future.
25-09-2019, 09:35 AM
102
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Way I look at it we are now ruled by whoever has the most money because reporters this morning tryin to tell us anyone can take a case to court if they want is so wrong it's painful. Only people can really take cases to court are rich.It's interesting all the people did this either work for EU or have a spouse working for EU. It's a foreign power interfering in UK governance. If we thought the EU was too powerful before this to me shows us they are the law and rule us above the queen and our PM.
I just hope boris comes back and forces a GE so we can make ourselves heard. I'd love to see Unliberal Undemocratic party wiped out and Labour shown the door too. I never thought I'd say that but Boris has to have a proper chance to get us out.
25-09-2019, 09:38 AM
103
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by AidoPotato
->
Wonder all you want JBR. The prorogue was dealt with and we now move on. All parties prior to the 3 days agreed it had nothing to do with Brexit. It's only in your own head that it's anti-Brexit. The added time in parliament increases the chances that UK citizens can continue to be protected from unlawful activity. That is what parliament are there for. Anything you think of beyond this is only your opinion, and is likely a conspiracy theory that fits around your narrative.
You're actually saying that Gina Miller brought this case for non Brexit reasons?
Ha Ha!
25-09-2019, 09:44 AM
104
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by Julie1962
->
Way I look at it we are now ruled by whoever has the most money because reporters this morning tryin to tell us anyone can take a case to court if they want is so wrong it's painful. Only people can really take cases to court are rich. It's interesting all the people did this either work for EU or have a spouse working for EU. It's a foreign power interfering in UK governance. If we thought the EU was too powerful before this to me shows us they are the law and rule us above the queen and our PM.
I just hope boris comes back and forces a GE so we can make ourselves heard. I'd love to see Unliberal Undemocratic party wiped out and Labour shown the door too. I never thought I'd say that but Boris has to have a proper chance to get us out.
What do you think this is? A democracy?
Maybe we should hire Gina to sort them out.
The big EU leader is quoted, in today's Telegraph, as saying "and you Brits are always complaining that you want out because the EU Is undemocratic ………!"
25-09-2019, 09:52 AM
105
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by Tedc
->
Now that made me laugh out loud!You're actually saying that Gina Miller brought this case for non Brexit reasons?
Ha Ha!
25-09-2019, 09:53 AM
106
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by swimfeeders
->
HiThe Supreme Court is concerned with the Law and that is that.
Boris a member of the Establishment and the Political Elite.
Lady Hale is a Grammar School girl from Yorkshire who got to the top on merit, not who she knew
All she has done is made sure that nobody is above the Law and in doing so, has done us all a favour.
The thought of Corbyn suspending Parliament to get his own way is horrendous.
The whole of the Supreme Court have made mincemeat of the Political Elite and told Parliament to sort it out.
It is a vital principle of our way of life is that nobody is above the Law.
We need an Election, the sooner the better, a majority in Parliament and then out we go.
We are in a mess, but it is nothing compared to the mess that Corbyn would make of it.
that the good lady did not set out the context of why Boris
made the decision to prorogue! which was that of any moves
to complete brexit have been met with what amount to
dirty tricks and misuse of archaic rules and regulations to
subvert the will of the people? That she did not do this l
think is revealing?
Perhaps she thinks that Boris will go for appeal if that is
possible, and mitigation can be considered then?
What do you think?
Regards Donkeyman!
25-09-2019, 10:02 AM
107
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by Puddle Duck
->
Without saying it in so many words, the courts HAVE overruled the Head of State. So WHO are the courts answerable to ? This is like a page out of the history books.
25-09-2019, 10:05 AM
108
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by globeflower
->
The Head of State is not above the Law, they are answerable to both Parliament and the Courts. Otherwise we would have a Dictatorship. Have a look in your history book and see what happened to Charles I.
25-09-2019, 10:12 AM
109
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by Julie1962
->
I am trying to come up with one dictator who asked for a general election ? I think the idea we had a dictatorship is crazy he asked for a general election for goodness sake. We have elections again dictators don't so where is this dictator because it isn't Boris.
How can this be?
Regards Donkeyman!
25-09-2019, 10:20 AM
110
Re: The Prorogation Court Case
Originally Posted by globeflower
->
The Head of State is not above the Law, they are answerable to both Parliament and the Courts. Otherwise we would have a Dictatorship. Have a look in your history book and see what happened to Charles I.
So even though the Queen has a silent roll politically, if she so wished, could she question the courts ruling ?
|
|
