Welcome to Over50sForum! The site for people over 50 to chat, make friends, discuss, share, and generally be part of something that's fun and friendly :)
I am no monarchist but I do think the USA has a cheek expecting Andrew to co operate when they won't co operate over the woman who killed a boy by driving on the wrong side of the road.
I am no monarchist but I do think the USA has a cheek expecting Andrew to co operate when they won't co operate over the woman who killed a boy by driving on the wrong side of the road.
I thought that too Muddy - maybe there could be a deal done ... a straight swop, Andrew for Anne Sacoolas!
I am no monarchist but I do think the USA has a cheek expecting Andrew to co operate when they won't co operate over the woman who killed a boy by driving on the wrong side of the road.
I agree, ruddy cheek!
I read quite a few letters sent to the newspapers today saying exactly the same thing too.
Years ago this would have been well hidden with Bribery and corruption, especially in the Victorian era.
This is the accountable era, in which many men and others take a chance of not being found out, and then deny vehemently and wrong doing.
The Duke of York has been requested by the US authorities to testify about his relationship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the BBC has been told.
"It was first reported in the Sun that the US Department of Justice had made a formal request to speak to Prince Andrew as part of its Epstein inquiry.
He has been heavily criticised for his friendship with the US financier.
The duke has previously said he did not witness any suspicious behaviour during visits to Epstein's homes."
This next proposed 'interview' should be interesting if it happens: