Re: WASPI and Voting
It could be argued that in response to women wanted to be treated equally, having the same retirement age makes a lot of sense. What doesn't make sense is why the changes weren't phased in over time to lessen the burden.Re: WASPI and Voting
Re: WASPI and Voting
In a perfect world, everybody should be retiring at the age of 60. After all, what is the point of pensions if one is too knackered to enjoy their retirement. It will only get worse, I can see the magical age of 70 being the benchmark for retirement before long. It used to be that we lived for three score years and ten, but now all we hear from politicians is that many people are now living well into their late eighties.Re: WASPI and Voting
Re: WASPI and Voting
Re: WASPI and Voting
I agree LT. i was only three years off that age when I retired from full time work. I worked in a lovely plush office complete with leather chair and oak desk. but.,. I still had to leave at 5.30am every morning, commute to get to work, and not get home again until 7pm. It was not the work therefore that made my decision to stop working at 67, I could have worked for years more, it was the cold stations, late or cancelled trains, the long commuting times and almost falling asleep as I ate dinner every evening. Just two hours spent with HWMO and it was bed by 10pm every week night.Re: WASPI and Voting
Re: WASPI and Voting
|