15-01-2016, 09:59 PM
21
Re: A good deed with nasty consequences
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
The poor women made a humanitarian gesture that was grossly abused and you are making excuses for the ingrats that have brought trouble upset and expense upon her?
16-01-2016, 01:08 AM
25
Re: A good deed with nasty consequences
Originally Posted by Julie1962
->
Read back and you would see.
So the generous altruistic woman should have 'brought them back into society with care' rather than 'putting them straight into an hotel'?
Perhaps she should have held their hands whilst gently taking them back to her own home, explaining on the way how responsible people should behave but at the same time assuring them that they are really very nice people.
Then they could have trashed her own home!
(Sarcastic mode off.)
16-01-2016, 06:06 AM
26
Re: A good deed with nasty consequences
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
Julie you are wrong .Its ok to be wrong you know most of us are a lot of the time.
Not all the poor and destitute are deserving sometimes as in this case they are just AHs
16-01-2016, 11:29 AM
29
Re: A good deed with nasty consequences
Originally Posted by Julie1962
->
It's very difficult when you live on the street not to become feral I know when we were homeless it was only because we still had jobs we stayed anchored and didn't fall into the abys.
16-01-2016, 11:43 AM
30
Re: A good deed with nasty consequences
Originally Posted by clumsy
->
So if someone did you a good turn, put you up in a hotel for example, you would think it okay to trash the place because you had gone "feral"?
|
|
