05-09-2017, 08:47 AM
1
Party faithful -v- TM
Seems the scumbag 'nasty party' are no longer ennamoured with TM and half of them want her 'gone'. Who I wonder would be prepared to be the 'stalking horse' at their conference to trigger a leadership election???http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...3D-82973619_uk
05-09-2017, 09:27 AM
2
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Half the Tories want her gone...half of Labour want Corbyn gone.Remember how they kept reminding us that MPs salaries should be higher every time there is a pay rise, to match the private sector and attract the very best people into politics?
Well where are they? All I'm seeing year in year out is a bunch of second class civil servants that couldn't run a tap.
The confidence of the British people in their representatives has never been lower...it's 'Yes Minister' in real life.
Who to vote for at the next election...God only knows.
05-09-2017, 11:31 AM
4
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Perhaps it's time for a different system altogether ? This adversarial system isn't getting us the sort of people we need at the top. Surely better if we had parties that could work together bringing best of all parties to the table to actually talk about our problems and the way forward.Stop the arguing from left to right and back again and accept all parties have some good ideas we can try.
05-09-2017, 11:44 AM
5
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Originally Posted by Rainmaker
->
If only half of them want her gone, that's progress for the Conservatives. A few months ago just after the election, they all wanted her gone.
As we live in a democracy, why didn't they get their wish??? Could it be that the scumbag 'nasty party' are not truly democratic???
05-09-2017, 05:39 PM
6
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Originally Posted by Uncle Joe
->
As we live in a democracy, why didn't they get their wish??? Could it be that the scumbag 'nasty party' are not truly democratic???
05-09-2017, 05:52 PM
7
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Originally Posted by Rainmaker
->
They're more democratic than Labour, who will never be democratic with the unions and Momentum pulling their strings. They certainly more democratic than you're average Communist party.
Really??? - then explain to me why May wasn't ditched immediately following the disasterous General Election???
05-09-2017, 05:56 PM
8
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Originally Posted by Rainmaker
->
They're more democratic than Labour, who will never be democratic with the unions and Momentum pulling their strings. They certainly more democratic than you're average Communist party.
05-09-2017, 06:03 PM
9
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Why should she be? She won. It's also pretty obvious to some of us that to ditch her, as you put it, may have done more harm than good. Nor was it the disaster you make out, the Conservatives gained more votes than they did at the previous election. At least the Conservatives can replace their leader if they don't perform unlike Labour and the Communists.05-09-2017, 06:08 PM
10
Re: Party faithful -v- TM
Originally Posted by Rainmaker
->
Why should she be? She won. It's also pretty obvious to some of us that to ditch her, as you put it, may have done more harm than good. Nor was it the disaster you make out, the Conservatives gained more votes than they did at the previous election. At least the Conservatives can replace their leader if they don't perform unlike Labour and the Communists.
Yes we know that - the wicked witch of the west was stabbed in the back by the 1922 committee wasn't she, as was that bald git IDS.
|
|
