Easter comes early to Egypt
Stories concerning the imposition of “hadd” shar'ia law now that the Muslim Brotherhood have gained power (in spite of denying they ever intended to do so) have been circulating for some time though interestingly enough not up to now in the British Press. And keep in mind that shar'ia IS Islam.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/08/16...secular-media/
Now it seems that the embargo, if such a thing existed, has been broken with the breaking news that in Egypt crucifixion is taking place.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...s-website.html
Even Himmlers
SchutzStaffel (the SS) didn't include anything so dreadful as crucifixion in their formal rules on how to deal with the opposition and goodness knows the SS were bad enough – I should know. I have, or rather had an uncle who was an officer in the SS and he had plenty to say on the subject not least how much bad and untrue “press” they received.
He wasn't quite so supportive towards some of the
Geheime Staatspolizei (the Gestapo) but that's another matter, although once again the worst was done by individuals and collections of individuals rather than under the direction of any “Orders of the Day”.
But enough of that, the point was that while individuals or groups did awful things from time to time there was nothing to come even close to the rules under which such things as the crucifixion of those who impede or insult or even just try to leave Islam are demanded.
And they ARE demanded. Certain punishments MUST be extracted or if they are not by a person who has the opportunity to do so then he falls into the same hole as the guy whose head is on the block.
Or whose going to be nailed to a tree.
I would love to comment further but the law prevents me from doing so,
Arab Spring?
It's a strange world where Spring is immediately followed by the depths of an ice age.