08-06-2019, 07:49 PM
111
Re: Kenneth Noye
Originally Posted by Besoeker
->
Of course not. It just means that I don't know anyone who is sympathetic to those who committed violent crimes.
08-06-2019, 08:01 PM
114
Re: Kenneth Noye
Originally Posted by Zuleika
->
Nor do I but we 're labelled as such should we dare to say we're against capital punishment ?
I certainly did not label Besoker as anything.
I don't believe in hanging,no one has tried to stop me voicing it,just difference of opinions.
08-06-2019, 08:17 PM
116
Re: Kenneth Noye
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
Who has labelled you anything ?Let's keep strictly to the facts please .
08-06-2019, 08:28 PM
117
Re: Kenneth Noye
This is how the parole board came to their decision . A summary of the panel’s decision listed a series of risks associated with Noye’s release. These included “his readiness to carry and use weapons” and “not being able to resolve arguments reasonably at key moments”. It also noted that in the past Noye “held unhelpful attitudes concerning the use of violence and did not always control extreme emotions well”.But the panel, which was presented with a 439-page dossier on Noye’s behaviour, was told he “demonstrated maturity about his situation, as well as greater insight into his past behaviour”.
It heard that that Noye “demonstrated an ability to deal appropriately with potentially violent situations in prison and was clearly well-motivated to avoid further offending in the community.”
Professional witnesses interviewed by the panel all said Noye had “addressed his risk factors appropriately and had reduced his risk to the public.”
08-06-2019, 08:33 PM
118
Re: Kenneth Noye
Originally Posted by pauline3
->
I have to say,Zuelker,has a very good point,when she mentioned about the papers,showing a picture of that young girl,( the victims girlfriend)
Of course if the parole board is to be believed he's harmless now.
08-06-2019, 08:35 PM
119
Re: Kenneth Noye
Originally Posted by Zuleika
->
This is how the parole board came to their decision . A summary of the panel’s decision listed a series of risks associated with Noye’s release. These included “his readiness to carry and use weapons” and “not being able to resolve arguments reasonably at key moments”. It also noted that in the past Noye “held unhelpful attitudes concerning the use of violence and did not always control extreme emotions well”.But the panel, which was presented with a 439-page dossier on Noye’s behaviour, was told he “demonstrated maturity about his situation, as well as greater insight into his past behaviour”.
It heard that that Noye “demonstrated an ability to deal appropriately with potentially violent situations in prison and was clearly well-motivated to avoid further offending in the community.”
Professional witnesses interviewed by the panel all said Noye had “addressed his risk factors appropriately and had reduced his risk to the public.”
He must be laughing.his head off.
|
|
