15-02-2019, 06:39 PM
12
Re: McDonnell's views on Churchill.
Originally Posted by big ben
->
Good Morning Uncle TomHow easy it is to criticize someone when they are dead and cannot respond to the accusations. Say whatever you will, Churchill was our saviour during WW2. I lived through those years and will be ever grateful for his leadership.
15-02-2019, 06:49 PM
14
Re: McDonnell's views on Churchill.
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
He was a leader when the country needed one .
15-02-2019, 07:10 PM
16
Re: McDonnell's views on Churchill.
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
He was a leader when the country needed one .
15-02-2019, 07:54 PM
18
Re: McDonnell's views on Churchill.
Originally Posted by Realist
->
The usual sensationalist clap trap from our resident Communist supporting dinosaur.Let's have the real story not the half baked BS that the Grauniad comes up with for it's weak minded robotic audience
https://winstonchurchill.org/publica...of-lethal-gas/
I saw this paragraph recently giving a marvelous example of their mashed up spelling
To return to spelling, you doubt that we have made "vast improvements"? How about this 45-year-old cutting from the paper:
"The Republican National Comittee decided in the spring that its chances of the White House in 1964 would be very slim indeed if it did not capture California, the second largest state, in 1962. Nobody less than its strongest possible vote-getter would do to defeat the incumbent Governor, Edmund (Pat) Brown. When it said this, Mr Nion was looking towards Washington, but the committee was liiking at Mr Nixon. He would have to oick the candidate, and if he oicked another man, eho lost, the party would be loth to nominate for the Preidency a national leader whose influence could not carry his own state in a state election. Yet, if Mr Noxon ran himself and won, he would practiclly forsweat the presidency; for, like allaspiring governors, he has been bocal and bitter about men who use the governor's mansion as a springboard int the White House."
15-02-2019, 08:01 PM
19
Re: McDonnell's views on Churchill.
Originally Posted by Robert Junior
->
AAH the GRAUNIAD, the name takes me back to the swinging sixties and Richard Ingrams stint as editor of Private Eye and the first appearance of this soubriquet.I saw this paragraph recently giving a marvelous example of their mashed up spelling
To return to spelling, you doubt that we have made "vast improvements"? How about this 45-year-old cutting from the paper:
"The Republican National Comittee decided in the spring that its chances of the White House in 1964 would be very slim indeed if it did not capture California, the second largest state, in 1962. Nobody less than its strongest possible vote-getter would do to defeat the incumbent Governor, Edmund (Pat) Brown. When it said this, Mr Nion was looking towards Washington, but the committee was liiking at Mr Nixon. He would have to oick the candidate, and if he oicked another man, eho lost, the party would be loth to nominate for the Preidency a national leader whose influence could not carry his own state in a state election. Yet, if Mr Noxon ran himself and won, he would practiclly forsweat the presidency; for, like allaspiring governors, he has been bocal and bitter about men who use the governor's mansion as a springboard int the White House."
|
|
