08-10-2020, 10:55 AM
462
Re: Extinction the facts
Originally Posted by Muddy
->
Fake news.
It would be poetic justice if one of their 'leading lights' had been on that ambulance with a life-threatening condition.
08-10-2020, 10:57 AM
463
Re: Extinction the facts
Originally Posted by JBR
->
Sorry to confuse you, Muddy. I was referring, in humour, to Annie's grammatical error.
I have just had this vision of you sitting in the bath nibbling on a plastic toy fish .
( it alright the bath Water was deep )
08-10-2020, 10:59 AM
464
Re: Extinction the facts
Originally Posted by Vlad
->
https://order-order.com/2020/08/28/p...ion-rebellion/.As Gaia revealed this morning, the civil service is being told to prepare for a bank holiday weekend cyber attack from Extinction Rebellion. This is the latest in a long line of illegal acts perpetrated by the extremist group. Gaia is informed that for an organisation to be proscribed it must fit the definition of the Terrorism Act (2000). Below we reproduce that act’s definition of terrorism with relevant sections in bold…
Inconveniencing people is one thing, but causing damage and threat to life is something that really needs to be stamped on.
In the good old days, a naughty child would be given a good hiding, which taught them right from wrong. These overgrown naughty children need to be punished severely so that they, too, understand the difference between right and wrong.
08-10-2020, 11:00 AM
465
Re: Extinction the facts
Originally Posted by JBR
->
But you've just seen SF's video and report. Are you really suggesting that there wasn't an emergency ambulance delayed by traffic due to eco-warriors' blocking highways?It would be poetic justice if one of their 'leading lights' had been on that ambulance with a life-threatening condition.
I have given my reasons .
It would have been fine the ambulance would have got through.
Ambulances are frequently held up by traffic jams until the cars are able pull to one side
08-10-2020, 11:00 AM
466
Re: Extinction the facts
Originally Posted by JBR
->
Exactly. Prosecuting them under the accusation of terrorism is what's needed.Inconveniencing people is one thing, but causing damage and threat to life is something that really needs to be stamped on.
In the good old days, a naughty child would be given a good hiding, which taught them right from wrong. These overgrown naughty children need to be punished severely so that they, too, understand the difference between right and wrong.
08-10-2020, 11:11 AM
468
Re: Extinction the facts
He’s not against them he’s for them .He was just being diplomatic because he’s a diplomatic old man taking to the Sun Newspaper and he’s astute .
He s not going to give them fuel for some trashy headline)
( people Apart from old Alf Garnetts actually read that rag ?)
There is nothing wrong or illegal about peaceful demonstrations ..
|
|
