Re: Getting UK cricket a bad name or just having fun?
Re: Getting UK cricket a bad name or just having fun?
It seems there was more to this than first thought. We're told that he was defending two gays who were being abused. It is very difficult to only punch so hard as is necessary to stop aggression. Lets wait for further information.Re: Getting UK cricket a bad name or just having fun?
Whatever the 'truth' of the incident the camera doesn't lie and Stokes was clearly seen to be fighting outside a nightclub which is not a good image for someone who represents his country in a sport and is a mentor to the young.Re: Getting UK cricket a bad name or just having fun?
He said somewhere he had 8 shots of spirits but didn't feel drunk - bullsh1t! - can hold his booze can he - his legal team decided NOT to use the two gay guys as witnesses - interesting - I would have thought they would have been a great asset to the case? - it smells - whispers in the judges backroom?Re: Getting UK cricket a bad name or just having fun?
He has previous with drink related incidents, he was sent back from 2013 tour of Australia for flouting rules. He fractured his hand thumping locker because of being dismissed early in a match, clearly with or without alcohol has anger management problem.Re: Getting UK cricket a bad name or just having fun?
well it looks like even the aussies don't want him on a loan option?
|