30-09-2019, 10:06 AM
61
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by globeflower
->
Almost correct. The Conservatives weren't elected outright, they had to slip their chums in the DUP a trifling billion quid in order to secure a working majority. Clearly that's how politics work. Boris then binned his by now tiny majority, rendering his own government impotent and in a minority.So if Jezza now joins up with some other parties to form a government, that's also how politics work.
Labour haven't won anything for 22 years. Dream on - the beard is unelectable.
30-09-2019, 12:14 PM
62
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by Bread
->
No - the Conservatives formed a government with the DUP when they won the election by their majority with the DUP in 2017. Labour haven't won anything for 22 years. Dream on - the beard is unelectable.
30-09-2019, 12:34 PM
63
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by globeflower
->
What kind of a person would sneak into No. 10 without a general election?Oh yes, that would be Boris the Animal
30-09-2019, 04:59 PM
64
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by globeflower
->
Still wrong. And C- for maths. Labour won the 2005 election, which, unless we are living in 2027, was not 22 years ago. Please try harder.
Is this the answer you should have received? Excluding the possibility you were lied to.
The*2017*snap election resulted in a hung parliament, with the*Conservative*Party having returned the most seats in the House of Commons with 317*Conservative*MPs, but without an overall*majority*needed to govern (326 out of 650 seats).
30-09-2019, 05:26 PM
65
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by Solasch
->
Why depend on a faulty memory when there is a world wide web?Is this the answer you should have received? Excluding the possibility you were lied to.
The*2017*snap election resulted in a hung parliament, with the*Conservative*Party having returned the most seats in the House of Commons with 317*Conservative*MPs, but without an overall*majority*needed to govern (326 out of 650 seats).
Who is the UK government?
Erm ????
30-09-2019, 07:58 PM
67
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by globeflower
->
Do you mean now, next week, or next month?
It will still be the conservatives. Nobody but them wants an election, there is a reason for that. All the other parties are cowards and know they would lose by a country mile.
How is Corbyn's immigration policy going? Popular is it ?
30-09-2019, 10:08 PM
68
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by Bread
->
It will still be the conservatives. Nobody but them wants an election, there is a reason for that. All the other parties are cowards and know they would lose by a country mile.How is Corbyn's immigration policy going? Popular is it ?
I'm not a spokesperson for the Corbynator, I daresay the popularity or otherwise of his policies can be judged after the election.
30-09-2019, 10:10 PM
69
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by globeflower
->
I don't think Boris is that keen on an election - if he was, he could buy a stamp, dash off his extension request, and presto! Election sorted. I'm not a spokesperson for the Corbynator, I daresay the popularity or otherwise of his policies can be judged after the election.
He's called for one twice
Corbyn, swinson, sturgeon all ran away like cowards.
30-09-2019, 10:11 PM
70
Re: Katie Hopkins in the Supreme Court
Originally Posted by Judd
->
Or perhaps Gordon Brown?
|
|
