Re: ----- war ----
Originally Posted by
JBR
->
I must say that I'm surprised at that. I stand corrected.
I would have thought that it must be cheaper to put a satellite in orbit than to lay an undersea cable, but there you are.
I also hadn't realised that undersea cables now use fibre optics but, on reflection, I suppose that using copper conductors would mean amplifying the signal at points along the length.
The problem with satellites is the delay because of the distance the signal has to travel. In the 70s and 80s ringing the UK was awful because of this delay, one party would think the other wasn't speaking and start talking again. With the much shorter distances used by fibre optics this delay is minimal.
The world has changed since I worked in telecommunications, microwave and coax when I started was going to be the future. Now it is just something that used to be. Microwave is really only used for temporary links. Just look at the PO Tower in London, when I worked there it had dozens of microwave dishes sending signals all over Britain, today it has none, the technology has come and gone in my working lifetime.
Travelling up the Stuart Highway from Adelaide to Darwin at the side of the road about every 30km was a concrete hut and a solar array powering the coaxial route. These days three quarters of those arrays are empty as the coax has been replaced by fibre which doesn't need so many repeaters and has a vastly wider bandwidth.