25-03-2021, 02:44 PM
62
Re: Sturgeon V Salmond
Originally Posted by Bread
->
She hasn't got off with it at all, she is just not listening to the conclusion of the committee and instead listening to the conclusion of her SNP bankrolled QC.She misled Parliament ... there is no getting away from that.
Just like Boris misled his Parliament over covid contracts, child poverty, and goodness knows what else. But you never said a word about that.
https://www.joe.co.uk/news/resignbor...liament-265654
25-03-2021, 08:44 PM
63
Re: Sturgeon V Salmond
Originally Posted by Longdogs
->
She got off with it. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...itics-56482878
His report said Ms Sturgeon had given an "incomplete narrative of events" to MSPs.
But he said this was a "genuine failure of recollection" and not deliberate.
Mr Hamilton said it was "regrettable" that Ms Sturgeon had not told MSPs about this meeting, but that he found it "difficult to think of any convincing reason" for her to deliberately conceal it.
He said she had given parliament "an incomplete narrative of events", but added: "I accept that this omission was the result of a genuine failure of recollection and was not deliberate."
Seems we have a very forgetful First Minister
25-03-2021, 09:27 PM
64
Re: Sturgeon V Salmond
Originally Posted by scot37
->
She has certainly got off lightly considering some of the points highlighted in the report :-His report said Ms Sturgeon had given an "incomplete narrative of events" to MSPs.
But he said this was a "genuine failure of recollection" and not deliberate.
Mr Hamilton said it was "regrettable" that Ms Sturgeon had not told MSPs about this meeting, but that he found it "difficult to think of any convincing reason" for her to deliberately conceal it.
He said she had given parliament "an incomplete narrative of events", but added: "I accept that this omission was the result of a genuine failure of recollection and was not deliberate."
Seems we have a very forgetful First Minister
|
|
