For your convenience I've translated part of the dutch article.

The lawsuit was brought in 2015 by mainly conservative German professors. They had asked the court in Karlsruhe to block German participation in the buy-back program. At that time, the court was not prepared to do so. Instead, the German judges turned to the EU Court in Luxembourg for advice. Entirely according to the rules, because "Luxembourg" and not "Karlsruhe" decides on the interpretation of EU law, which also includes the ECB. In 2018, the EU court ruled that the ECB's purchases are indeed legal. This advice is now being ignored by the German court, a decision by which it effectively forces a constitutional crisis with EU judges in Luxembourg. Because in principle the EU Court, and not the German court, tests EU law. In principle, the German court is only the guardian of the German constitution, but now suddenly presents itself as an arbitrator of European monetary policy.

Not overruled, but ignored a previous ruling by the only competent court on these matters. It seems it is beyond you.

So which is the dog, and which the tail then Solly???
The ECJ or the german courts?

Donkeyman! 🤔🤔

For your convenience I've translated part of the dutch article.

The lawsuit was brought in 2015 by mainly conservative German professors. They had asked the court in Karlsruhe to block German participation in the buy-back program. At that time, the court was not prepared to do so. Instead, the German judges turned to the EU Court in Luxembourg for advice. Entirely according to the rules, because "Luxembourg" and not "Karlsruhe" decides on the interpretation of EU law, which also includes the ECB. In 2018, the EU court ruled that the ECB's purchases are indeed legal. This advice is now being ignored by the German court, a decision by which it effectively forces a constitutional crisis with EU judges in Luxembourg. Because in principle the EU Court, and not the German court, tests EU law. In principle, the German court is only the guardian of the German constitution, but now suddenly presents itself as an arbitrator of European monetary policy.

Not overruled, but ignored a previous ruling by the only competent court on these matters. It seems it is beyond you.

Hi

Get a life Bread.

Brexit is a sideshow now.

We are leaving, a minor issue compared with Covid 19.

Brexit is not going to cause 30,000 deaths.

It is going to happen at the end of the year and that is the least of our worries.

The German court ruled that the ECB has acted beyond its remit and its actions were unlawful.

Get it right FFS

You only have to remember one thing and you can't go remiss: The final word in EU law is always spoken in Luxembourg. Nowhere else.

Thats what the EU said, when Germanys Court over ruled them.

Looks like Germany rules you more than you thought Solasch, now the German dear leader is suing her own country.

Brilliant!

National courts cannot overrule an international court like the ECJ.

As a matter of fact I'm with the german plaintiffs on this occasion. Their next goal is to stop the PEPP (look it up for yourself). As you know the netherlands are against those 750 bn €.
https://www.handelsblatt.com/finanze...hMvv1mUAC0-ap4

You've completely missed the point.

Again ....