Join for free
Page 13 of 13 « First < 3 11 12 13
JBR's Avatar
JBR
Chatterbox
JBR is offline
Cheshire, UK
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 32,785
JBR is male  JBR has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
09-11-2016, 03:04 PM
121

Re: Clinton v Trump

Originally Posted by swimfeeders ->
Hi

I have to disagree with you Plummy.

Trump will do a deal with Putin, he will let him have Syria and those parts of the Ukraine which are ethnically Russian.

Job done, minimal casualties and enforced migration and the end of ISIS, Putin will wipe them out, ruthlessly and totally.

No more Syrian refugee crisis

Trump, for all his problems, is a realist , nobody has ever prodded the Russian Bear and won.

When push comes to shove, the battle will be fought here in Europe, not in the USA or Australia.

It will involve millions of casualties, with the UK a prime target.

The first Tactical Nukes will be here in the UK.. not anywhere else.

I am giving away no secrets , the order of Battle is well known.

First Cornwall, second Bushey, third Martlesham, fourth the Clyde, fifth Junction 9 of the M6, seventh Harrogate, eighth Telford, ningth is three locations in Hampshire.

They will not use strategic Nukes, they will not target strategic sites such as London. they are not idiots and will need to negotiate with us.

We are a very small island, the effects of these will be to destroy us forever,

Russia is an immense Country, they would survive.

Both Clinton and Trump will sell us down the river to protect the USA, that is their job.

Trump wants no part of prodding Putin. it is bad for business.

Clinton does, she is a Blair Clone, the high moral ground and she will sell us down the line.
I agree with you. Clinton would have pushed the Russians too far and God knows what would have happened.

As for tactical nukes aimed at Britain, an excellent reason for us to keep our noses out. If the EU wants to interfere with Russian activities, let them suffer the consequences. Unfortunately, we are still part of NATO whether in or out of the EU, but if the EU want to stick their noses into Russia's own business, we should declare that we are not interested and let them carry the can. If America (and thus NATO) is at risk of being drawn in, hopefully they would do the same.

Yes, I know the basis of NATO is that if a member state is attacked, all members are attacked. On that basis, perhaps the EU should be excluded, at least until their expansionist intentions stop or the whole caboodle collapses naturally.
Rehab44
Chatterbox
Rehab44 is offline
Nil
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 10,394
Rehab44 is male  Rehab44 has posted at least 25 times and has been a member for 3 months or more 
 
09-11-2016, 03:16 PM
122

Re: Clinton v Trump

Originally Posted by JBR ->
I agree with you. Clinton would have pushed the Russians too far and God knows what would have happened.

As for tactical nukes aimed at Britain, an excellent reason for us to keep our noses out. If the EU wants to interfere with Russian activities, let them suffer the consequences. Unfortunately, we are still part of NATO whether in or out of the EU, but if the EU want to stick their noses into Russia's own business, we should declare that we are not interested and let them carry the can. If America (and thus NATO) is at risk of being drawn in, hopefully they would do the same.

Yes, I know the basis of NATO is that if a member state is attacked, all members are attacked. On that basis, perhaps the EU should be excluded, at least until their expansionist intentions stop or the whole caboodle collapses naturally.
My goodness I thought for one moment I was reading something that was posted just before Germany invaded Poland, ' it's nothing to do with us, we should keep our noses out of European problems, and that nice Mr Hitler doesn't want to attack us'
 
Page 13 of 13 « First < 3 11 12 13



© Copyright 2009, Over50sForum   Contact Us | Over 50s Forum! | Archive | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Top

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.